Leon FL Lawyers | Cindy Hebenthal Horne -- eLawyers

99-002809 LOIS T. ARNOLD vs DIVISION OF STATE GROUP INSURANCE (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 23, 1999

The issue in this case is whether the Respondent properly excluded coverage for care provided in the Petitioner's home to Thomas Nathan Roberts, the Petitioner's adult child, based upon the custodial care and disabilities exclusions of the State Group Health Insurance Plan?The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act must be considered in applying the State`s preexisting condition exclusion. Furthermore, Petitioner showed 120 hours of skilled care was medically necessary each week.

99-000627 SUSAN P. CARSWELL vs DIVISION OF STATE GROUP INSURANCE (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 09, 1999

Whether the Department properly excluded coverage for care provided to Petitioner’s child.Petitioner is entitled to payment of insurance claim since care by Licensed Practical Nurses is a nursing activity and not excluded by the custodial exclusion since the sole purpose of the care is not to aid in the activities of daily living.

96-005509 EDWARD HERNANDEZ vs DIVISION OF STATE EMPLOYEES INSURANCE (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 15, 1996

The issues for determination in this case are: 1) whether Respondent failed to provide Petitioner proper notice of continuation health care coverage under the Florida Employees Group Insurance Program; and, 2) whether Petitioner is entitled to reimbursement for medical expenses incurred subsequent to termination of his employment.Former state employee was not entitled to continuation of health care insurance coverage at contribution cost for full-time employees.

97-000494 SELECT INDUSTRIES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 03, 1997

The sole issue for disposition is whether Petitioner, Select Industries, Inc. should be placed on the convicted vendor list as provided in section 287.133, Florida Statutes (1996).Final order entered on parties' stipulation that all mitigating factors have been met and petitioner should not be placed on the convicted vendor list.

96-003846CVL TEKRESOURCE SERVICE CORPORATION, F/K/A AEROTEK RESOURCE CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 21, 1996

The issue is whether petitioner should be placed on the convicted vendor list.Stipulation by parties to not place vendor on convicted vendor's list approved.

96-000894BID STIMSONITE CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 21, 1996

Whether the Department of Management Services acted arbitrarily, fraudulently, illegally or dishonestly in rejecting the bid proposed by Petitioner Stimsonite Corporation; and Whether the Department of Management Services' proposed award of a contract to Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Inc. was arbitrary, illegal, fraudulent or dishonest.Distinguishes between minor and major variations from BID proposals; party may not submit mandatory material after BID opening.

95-006011BID PAC-TEC, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 13, 1995

Whether Petitioner's bid protest should be dismissed for failure to state with specificity the underlying facts of the protest or facts sufficient to form a basis for a bid protest.Protest failed to state cause of action for bid dispute after opportunity to amend.

95-005496BID ADVANTAGE SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 15, 1995

Whether the petition should be dismissed for failure to comply with Section 120.53(5)(b), Florida Statutes.Bid challenge to specification of Invitation To Bid not timely raised therefore dismissal recommended.

95-004862CVL SOUTHERN ROOFING COMPANY, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 06, 1995

The issue for determination is whether Petitioner, Southern Roofing Company, Inc., should be placed on the Convicted Vendor List, as provided in Section 287.133, Florida Statutes.Parties stipulated to all material facts adopted--not in public interest to place petitioner on convicted vendor list.

95-003115BID TAUL ENTERPRISES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 21, 1995

The issue is whether the Department of Management Services (DMS), in determining that the bid bond submitted by Petitioner, Taul Enterprises, Inc. (Taul) was not materially responsive to the specifications in the Invitation to Bid, and in deciding that the irregularity could not be waived, acted in a manner which was arbitrary, capricious, fraudulent, or illegal.Agency rejection of bid for failure to provide a responsive bid bond not arbitrary or capricious. Bid bond is a material specification of the Invitation to Bid.

Cindy Hebenthal Horne