welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. D. Kent Safriet
D. Kent Safriet
D. Kent Safriet
Visitors: 119
0
Bar #174939(FL)     License for 26 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you D. Kent Safriet? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.52, 120.53, 120.536, 120.54, 120.542, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.595, 120.60, 120.68, 161.011, 161.041, 161.053, 161.055, 161.088, 161.091, 161.131, 161.141, 161.161, 161.191, 161.201, 161.211, 161.212, 253.001, 253.002, 253.03, 253.04, 253.141, 253.68, 253.72, 253.73, 253.74, 253.75, 253.77, 258.004, 258.007, 267.061, 373.414, 379.2431, 403.201, 403.412, 550.0251, 550.2415, 92.16

Florida Administrative Code: 18-14.003, 18-21.003, 18-21.004, 18-21.005, 18-21.0051, 28-106.205, 61D-6.002, 62-110.106, 62-4.242, 62-4.244, 62B-36.002, 62B-41.002, 62B-41.005, 62B-41.007, 62B-41.008, 62B-49.002, 62B-49.003, 62B-49.005, 62B-49.013, 62D-2.014

21-001661RP  MARINE INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, INC. vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 21, 2021
The issues for disposition in this case are, first, whether the proposed adoption of Florida Administrative Code Rule 68D-24.017(1)(s) (the Proposed Rule) was based on the application of an unadopted rule, as defined in section 120.52(20), Florida Statutes, and, second, if it was not, whether the Proposed Rule is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority, as defined in section 120.52(8).The Proposed Rule was based on the application of an unadopted rule regarding vessel traffic congestion. Commission directed to discontinue reliance on the unadopted rule.
20-002123F  CITY OF DESTIN vs THOMAS WILSON, DAVID H. SHERRY, REBECCA R. SHERRY, AND JOHN S. DONOVAN  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 06, 2020
The issue to be determined is whether Destin is entitled to attorney’s fees pursuant to section 120.569(2)(e), from Respondents related to litigation between the parties in DOAH Case No. 19-3356.Petitioner failed to establish that Respondent filed any pleading, motion, or other paper in Case No. 19-3356 for an improper purpose. Thus, the motion for fees under section 120.595(2)(e) is denied.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer