Duval FL and Real estate Lawyers | David Cohen -- eLawyers

David Cohen

Visitors: 197

904-633-7979

Bar #803103(FL) License for 36 years

Jacksonville FL

Are you David Cohen? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 42 U.S.C 4601

CFR: 49 CFR 24

Florida Laws: 120.569, 120.57, 120.595, 57.105

992, Misc Parker v. United States (1970)

Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 27, 1970 Citations: 397 U.S. 96

397 U.S. 96 (1970) PARKER v. UNITED STATES No. 992, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided February 27, 1970 ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Walter L. Gerash for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley, Kevin T. Maroney, and Lee B. Anderson for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Upon consideration of the suggestion of mootness filed by..

250, Docket 20894 New York & H. Rosario Min. Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev. (1948)

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Filed: Jun. 01, 1948 Citations: 168 F.2d 745

168 F.2d 745 (1948) NEW YORK & HONDURAS ROSARIO MIN. CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 250, Docket 20894. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. June 1, 1948. *746 Reeves, Todd, Ely & Beaty, of New York City (Julian B. Beaty, David Cohen, and Francis D. Murray, all of New York City, of counsel), for petitioner. Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key, A. F. Prescott, and S. Dee Hanson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent. Before L. HAND, SWAN, and CLARK, Circuit J..

9-12 Phelps Dodge Refining Corp. v. FEDERAL TRADE COM'N (1943)

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Filed: Dec. 23, 1943 Citations: 139 F.2d 393

139 F.2d 393 (1943) PHELPS DODGE REFINING CORPORATION v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. TENNESSEE CORPORATION v. SAME. JOHN POWELL & CO., Inc., et al. v. SAME. AMERICAN CYANAMID & CHEMICAL CORPORATION v. SAME. Nos. 9-12. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. December 23, 1943. *394 *395 William H. Wurts, of New York City (Arthur W. Rinke, of New York City, of counsel), for petitioners in the first mentioned petition. Henry C. Little, of New York City (Arthur W. Rinke, of New York City, of counsel)..

281, Docket 20199 Bozant v. Bank of New York (1946)

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Filed: Jul. 08, 1946 Citations: 156 F.2d 787

156 F.2d 787 (1946) BOZANT et al. v. BANK OF NEW YORK. No. 281, Docket 20199. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. July 8, 1946. *788 Harry Rodwin, Goldwater & Flynn, and Minna F. Kassner, all of New York City (James L. Goldwater, of New York City, of counsel), for appellants. Harold H. Levin and Reeves, Todd, Ely & Beaty, all of New York City (Joseph M. Proskauer and David Cohen, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee. William S. Tyson, Sol., and Bessie Margolin, Asst. Sol., both ..

04-000730BID FLORIDA BUREAU OF LEGAL INVESTIGATIONS vs JACKSONVILLE TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 08, 2004

The issues are as follows: (a) whether Respondent failed to follow applicable policies and procedures in evaluating responses to Request for Proposal P-01-01 ("the RFP"); and (b) whether two of the bidders colluded in filing their proposals.All of the bid proposals were responsive to the Request for Proposal. There was no evidence of collusion between the two top-ranked bidders.

01-004836 THOMAS L. THOMAS vs JACKSONVILLE TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 29, 2001

Whether the comparable replacement dwellings used by the Jacksonville Transportation Authority (JTA) in the computation of the replacement housing payment offered to Petitioner were sufficient under the requirements of Title 49 C.F.R., Part 24, as adopted under the Florida Department of Transportation Right of Way Manual (Right of Way Manual), and whether Petitioner's property had water access which could be considered a compensable major exterior attribute of Petitioner's residential dwelling.Petitioner claimed his replacement housing payment should include loss of access to salt water creek. Held: access to creek was city right of way and could not be considered in calculating his payment.