Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
David H Charlip
David H Charlip
Visitors: 53
2

Hourly Rates $350-500/hour

Bar #329932(FL)     License for 43 years; Member in Good Standing
North Miami FL

Are you David H Charlip? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

07-3181  Allen v. Brown Clinic, PLLP  (2008)
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Filed: Jul. 02, 2008 Citations: 531 F.3d 568
531 F.3d 568 (2008) Edwin ALLEN; Joan Allen, (Spouse), Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BROWN CLINIC, P.L.L.P., a South Dakota Limited Liability Partnership, doing business as Brown Clinic; Edwin Gerrish, M.D., an individual, Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-3181. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: May 16, 2008. Filed: July 2, 2008. *570 David H. Charlip, Hollywood, FL, for appellant. Reed Alan Rasmussen, Aberdeen, SD, for appellee. *571 Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, BEAM, and BYE, Circ..
91-3249  Spillert v. Spillert  (1992)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Aug. 21, 1992 Citations: 603 So. 2d 700
603 So. 2d 700 (1992) Leonard J. SPILLERT, Appellant, v. Susan Carol SPILLERT, Appellee. No. 91-3249. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. August 21, 1992. Hal Castillo and John J. Rahaim, II, Jacksonville, for appellant. Elliot Zisser, Jacksonville, for appellee. PER CURIAM. Reviewing the second amended final judgment entered upon remand from our decision on the first appeal of this case, Spillert v. Spillert, 564 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), rev. denied, 576 So. 2d 291 (Fla...
88-2433  Smith v. Krugman-Kadi  (1989)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 18, 1989 Citations: 547 So. 2d 677
547 So. 2d 677 (1989) Geoffrey SMITH, Appellant, v. Eilon KRUGMAN-KADI and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellee. No. 88-2433. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. July 18, 1989. Rehearing Denied August 24, 1989. Wallace W. Hardy, Orlando, for appellant. John D. Maher, Tallahassee, for appellee/Unemployment Appeals Com'n. SHIVERS, Chief Judge. The appellant challenges the order of an unemployment appeals referee denying him unemployment compensation benefits on the gro..
SC07-1397  Pro-Art Dental Lab, Inc. v. V-Strategic Group, LLC  (2008)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jul. 10, 2008 Citations: 986 So. 2d 1244
986 So. 2d 1244 (2007) PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC., etc., Petitioner, v. V-STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC, etc., Respondent. No. SC07-1397. Supreme Court of Florida. July 10, 2008. *1245 David H. Charlip of Charlip Law Group, LC, Hollywood, FL, and Eric A. Jacobs of Eric A. Jacobs, P.A., Hollywood, FL, for Petitioner. Craig Barnett and Cory W. Eichhorn of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Respondent. LEWIS, J. This case is before the Court for review of the decision of the Fourth District Cour..
2D06-1869  State v. Conner  (2007)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Aug. 10, 2007 Citations: 962 So. 2d 912
962 So. 2d 912 (2007) STATE v. CONNER. No. 2D06-1869. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. August 10, 2007. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
2D05-4205  YAROS v. Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles  (2006)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jan. 18, 2006 Citations: 917 So. 2d 1062
917 So. 2d 1062 (2006) Michael YAROS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Respondent. No. 2D05-4205. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. January 18, 2006. Lee Adam Cohen of McDonald & Shearer, P.A., Lakeland, for Petitioner. Enoch J. Whitney, General Counsel, Tallahassee, and Heather Rose Cramer, Assistant General Counsel, Lake Worth, for Respondent. WALLACE, Judge. Michael Yaros petitions this court for certiorari review of a circuit court order that..
20-002062MTR  KRYSTAL COMBS vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 29, 2020
The issues are whether, pursuant to section 409.910(17)(b), Florida Statutes (17b),1 Petitioner has proved that Respondent's recovery of $224,0002 in medical assistance expenditures3 from $1.4 million in proceeds from the settlement of a personal injury action must be reduced to avoid conflict with 42 U.S.C. ยง 1396p(a)(1) (Anti Lien Statute)4; and, if so, the maximum allowable amount of Respondent's recovery.After reducing putative true value by inflated claim for pain and suffering, proportional reduction of total past medical expenses and imposition of pro rata share of attorneys' fees and costs resulted in a recovery of $123,000.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer