welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Edda Serrano-Blasini
Edda Serrano-Blasini
Edda Serrano-Blasini
Visitors: 87
0
Bar #868051(FL)     License for 21 years
Lake Mary FL

Are you Edda Serrano-Blasini? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

96-2213  Tirado-Acosta v. National Guard  (1997)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Jul. 10, 1997
National Guard program to assist in drug interdiction.positions taken by other Guard personnel.under the selective service statute.technician duties with the Guard.H, arguendo e, ow , this , court , would , decide such a case is unclear.technicians who claim reemployment protection.
96-1701  Roldan-Plumey v. Cerezo-Suarez  (1997)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Jun. 04, 1997
Defendants Appellees.Summary Judgment.solution of cases.discharge criteria.Puerto Rico.CRUV employees served under the disputed positions.related to the inherent duties of Hearing Examiner.position entails policymaking. Jim nez Fuentes, 807 F.2d at 242. See Gonz lez-Gonz lez, 878 F.2d at 1482.
96-1306  Rodriguez-Cirilo v. Garcia  (1997)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Jun. 02, 1997 Citations: 115 F.3d 50
The temporary detention order under Law 116 does not explicitly give police officers any discretion with regard to enforcement.3, 4, On the same day that the order was issued, Jorge, along with two of Francisco's siblings (but not Celso), went to a police station to have the order enforced.
96-1895  Vargas-Badillo v. Diaz-Torres  (1997)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: May 30, 1997 Citations: 114 F.3d 3
Briggs v. Malley, 748 F.2d 715, 719 (1st Cir.1984). Here, the following undisputed facts could, at the very least, have led reasonable police officers to believe that they were obeying the probable cause requirement in proceeding to arrest Vargas for driving under the influence of alcohol.
96-1332  Starlight Sugar v. Soto  (1997)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: May 30, 1997 Citations: 114 F.3d 330
As the district court properly found, where a state law or regulation, such as Section Six, facially discriminates against interstate commerce, and has as its very purpose the protection of local economic interests, it must withstand the most stringent form of scrutiny under the Commerce Clause.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer