Leon FL Lawyers | Frank E Matthews -- eLawyers

4D03-4534, 4D03-4537 Allstate Ins. Co. v. Holy Cross Hosp., Inc. (2005)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 02, 2005 Citations: 895 So. 2d 1241

895 So. 2d 1241 (2005) ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL, INC., as assignee of Matthew Winik, Appellee. Nos. 4D03-4534, 4D03-4537. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. March 2, 2005. Jack R. Reiter of Adorno & Yoss, P.A., Miami, and Richard C. Godfrey, P.C., and Andrew A. Kassof of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for appellants Allstate Insurance Co. and Allstate Indemnity Co. Peter J. Valeta of McGuire Woods LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for Amicus..

SC08-147 In Re Amendments to Rules of Appellate Procedure (2008)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Nov. 13, 2008 Citations: 2 So. 3d 89

2 So. 3d 89 (2008) In re AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE. No. SC08-147. Supreme Court of Florida. November 13, 2008. Rehearing Denied January 30, 2009. John S. Mills, Chair, Appellate Court Rules Committee, Jacksonville, FL; Steven L. Brannock, Past Chair, Appellate Court Rules Committee, Holland and Knight, Tampa, FL; John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and Krys Godwin, Bar Staff Liaison, The Florida Bar, and David Miller of Broad and Cassel, Tallahassee, FL, for Pe..

82-1348 Delgado v. State (1982)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Dec. 21, 1982 Citations: 423 So. 2d 603

423 So. 2d 603 (1982) Juan Jose DELGADO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 82-1348. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. December 21, 1982. Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Marti A. Rothenberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. *604 Before HUBBART, C.J., and HENDRY and NESBITT, JJ. PER CURIAM. The order revoking the appellant's probation is affirmed with one modification. The fin..

5D00-679 Paszamant v. Retirement Accounts, Inc. (2001)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 02, 2001 Citations: 776 So. 2d 1049

776 So. 2d 1049 (2001) Joan PASZAMANT, etc., et al., Appellant, v. RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS, INC., etc., Appellee. No. 5D00-679. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. February 2, 2001. *1050 William G. Osborne of William G. Osborne, P.A., Orlando and Barry N. Greenberg of Mishan, Sloto, Greenberg, Hellinger & Udolf, P.A., Miami, for Appellant. Anthony Deglomine, III and Nichole M. Mooney of Dean, Mead, Egerton, Bloodworth, Capouano & Bozarth, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee. PETERSON, J. Th..

JJ-252 Depson v. State (1978)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Oct. 09, 1978 Citations: 363 So. 2d 43

363 So. 2d 43 (1978) Thomas Edward DEPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. JJ-252. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. October 9, 1978. Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender and Janice G. Scott, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant. *44 Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. PER CURIAM. Thomas Edward Depson appeals from a revocation of probation alleging first of all that the court had no jurisdiction because his probationar..

05-002034 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2005

The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the City of Naples's (City) Waterway Marker Permit Application should be granted, given the requirements of Section 327.40, Florida Statutes (2005) and Florida Administrative Code Rule 68-23.105(1)(b)(3) through (6).Respondent City of Naples failed to show that delineating new slow boat speed zones with a waterway marking permit was needed for vessel traffic congestion, significant risk of collision or threat to public safety. Recommend that the permit be denied.

05-002035 MARINE INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC. vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION AND CITY OF NAPLES (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2005

The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the City of Naples's (City) Waterway Marker Permit Application should be granted, given the requirements of Section 327.40, Florida Statutes (2005) and Florida Administrative Code Rule 68-23.105(1)(b)(3) through (6).Respondent City of Naples failed to show that delineating new slow boat speed zones with a waterway marking permit was needed for vessel traffic congestion, significant risk of collision or threat to public safety. Recommend that the permit be denied.

05-002036 DOUGLAS FINLAY vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2005

The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the City of Naples's (City) Waterway Marker Permit Application should be granted, given the requirements of Section 327.40, Florida Statutes (2005) and Florida Administrative Code Rule 68-23.105(1)(b)(3) through (6).Respondent City of Naples failed to show that delineating new slow boat speed zones with a waterway marking permit was needed for vessel traffic congestion, significant risk of collision or threat to public safety. Recommend that the permit be denied.

05-002037 ERIC ALEXANDER, JACK HAIL, DAVE SIRKOS, JAMES PERGOLA AND ALLEN WALBURN vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION AND CITY OF NAPLES (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2005

The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the City of Naples's (City) Waterway Marker Permit Application should be granted, given the requirements of Section 327.40, Florida Statutes (2005) and Florida Administrative Code Rule 68-23.105(1)(b)(3) through (6).Respondent City of Naples failed to show that delineating new slow boat speed zones with a waterway marking permit was needed for vessel traffic congestion, significant risk of collision or threat to public safety. Recommend that the permit be denied.

12-003219 FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION vs CRP/HLV HIGHLANDS RANCH, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 26, 2012

Whether the Florida Department of Environmental Protection‘s (Department) notice of intent to issue an environmental resource/mitigation bank permit, and notice of intent to grant a variance waiving the financial responsibility requirements for the construction and implementation activities of the mitigation bank to Respondent, CRP/HLV Highlands Ranch, LLC (Highlands Ranch) should be approved, and under what conditions.The applicant is entitled to issuance of a mitigation bank permit, subject to reasonable time lag and risk factor scores. The applicant is not entitled to issuance of a variance from financial responsibility requirements.

Frank E Matthews

4D03-4534, 4D03-4537 Allstate Ins. Co. v. Holy Cross Hosp., Inc. (2005)

SC08-147 In Re Amendments to Rules of Appellate Procedure (2008)

82-1348 Delgado v. State (1982)

5D00-679 Paszamant v. Retirement Accounts, Inc. (2001)

JJ-252 Depson v. State (1978)

05-002034 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION (2005)

05-002035 MARINE INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC. vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION AND CITY OF NAPLES (2005)

05-002036 DOUGLAS FINLAY vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION (2005)

05-002037 ERIC ALEXANDER, JACK HAIL, DAVE SIRKOS, JAMES PERGOLA AND ALLEN WALBURN vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION AND CITY OF NAPLES (2005)

12-003219 FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION vs CRP/HLV HIGHLANDS RANCH, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2012)

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Search for lawyers by practice areas.