Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida
Filed: Jun. 18, 1991
Did the University receive Merit's qualification data during the "bidding period," or failing same, was the time and manner in which it was received such a material variance as to render it nonwaiveable and nonresponsive? Were the data provided by Merit responsive to the ITB? Did the University use the proper quantities for Task 150, Disposal in Landfill, in the third iteration (analysis)?Apparent successful bidder was responsive where basic qualifications were on file prior to bid submittal, but not filed simultaneoudly; protester wrong.
