welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Gabriel F V Warren
Gabriel F V Warren
Gabriel F V Warren
Visitors: 75
0
Bar #84777(FL)     License for 15 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Gabriel F V Warren? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

15-001967CON  MARION COUNTY HRC, LLC vs CMCP-PINECASTLE, LLC, AND MARION COUNTY DEVELOPMENT, LLC AND AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 10, 2015
Which certificate of need (CON) application seeking to establish a new community nursing home in Nursing Home District 3, Subdistrict 4 (Marion County), on balance, best satisfies the statutory and rule criteria for approval: Marion County Development, LLC's CON Application No. 10257; Marion County HRC, LLC's CON Application No. 10258; or CON APP Marion, LLC's CON Application No. 10256?Record supported Agency incipient policy to approve 120-bed CON for nursing home for short-term rehab patients who are Medicare patients. One competing applicant did not prove ability to finance or staff proposed facility.
20-001713CON  VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION OF FLORIDA vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 01, 2020
Whether the certificate of need (“CON”) applications filed by Cornerstone Hospice & Palliative Care, Inc. (“Cornerstone”); Suncoast Hospice of Hillsborough, LLC (“Suncoast”); and VITAS Healthcare Corporation of Florida (“VITAS”), for a new hospice program in Agency for Health Care Administration (“AHCA” or the “Agency”) Service Area 6A (Hillsborough County), satisfy the applicable statutory and rule review criteria sufficiently to warrant approval, and, if so, which of the three applications, on balance, best meets the applicable criteria for approval.With a published need for one new program, as between three competing applicants, Suncoast's proposed hospice best satisfies statutory and rule criteria, and should therefore be approved for Hillsborough County.
20-001733CON  SUNCOAST HOSPICE OF HILLSBOROUGH, LLC vs CORNERSTONE HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE, INC., AND VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION OF FLORIDA  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 03, 2020
Whether the certificate of need (“CON”) applications filed by Cornerstone Hospice & Palliative Care, Inc. (“Cornerstone”); Suncoast Hospice of Hillsborough, LLC (“Suncoast”); and VITAS Healthcare Corporation of Florida (“VITAS”), for a new hospice program in Agency for Health Care Administration (“AHCA” or the “Agency”) Service Area 6A (Hillsborough County), satisfy the applicable statutory and rule review criteria sufficiently to warrant approval, and, if so, which of the three applications, on balance, best meets the applicable criteria for approval.With a published need for one new program, as between three competing applicants, Suncoast's proposed hospice best satisfies statutory and rule criteria, and should therefore be approved for Hillsborough County.
21-000888CON  SEASONS HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OF PINELLAS COUNTY, LLC vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 09, 2021
Whether there is “an error in the Fixed Need Pool numbers” for hospice as calculated by the Agency for Health Care Administration (“AHCA”) pursuant to Florida Administrative Code Rule 59C-1.0355(4)(a), and as published by AHCA on February 5, 2021, pursuant to rule 59C-1.008(2)(a).Petitioners have failed to demonstrate that the FNP determination under challenge herein is in error. Not proper to consider "provisional" deaths data and VA hospice admissions.
21-000889CON  THE HOSPICE OF FLORIDA SUNCOAST, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 09, 2021
Whether there is “an error in the Fixed Need Pool numbers” for hospice as calculated by the Agency for Health Care Administration (“AHCA”) pursuant to Florida Administrative Code Rule 59C-1.0355(4)(a), and as published by AHCA on February 5, 2021, pursuant to rule 59C-1.008(2)(a).Petitioners have failed to demonstrate that the FNP determination under challenge herein is in error. Not proper to consider "provisional" deaths data and VA hospice admissions.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer