Leon FL Administrative law, Appeals and Government Lawyers | -- eLawyers - eLawyers.us

Jeffrey Brown

Visitors: 128

0

Bar #843430(FL) License for 35 years; Member in Good Standing

Tallahassee FL

Are you Jeffrey Brown? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 43 U.S.C 1301

CFR: 40 CFR 131, 40 CFR 131.11, 40 CFR 131.11, 40 CFR 131.11, 40 CFR 136

Florida Laws: 1004.49, 1012.01, 1012.22, 1012.23, 1012.315, 1012.33, 120.52, 120.536, 120.54, 120.541, 120.56, 120.565, 120.569, 120.57, 120.595, 120.62, 120.68, 163.3194, 20.255, 253.002, 253.03, 253.141, 258.004, 258.007, 267.061, 373.042, 373.0421, 373.406, 373.4131, 373.414, 373.421, 373.4592, 373.709, 376.30702, 377.21, 377.22, 377.24, 377.241, 377.242, 377.371, 377.42, 379.2431, 380.06, 380.07, 403.021, 403.061, 403.0623, 403.0625, 403.067, 403.201, 403.412, 403.813, 403.855, 403.861, 403.863, 403.93345, 550.0251, 550.2415, 57.105, 77.24, 775.085, 782.051, 782.09, 787.06, 790.166, 827.03, 838.015, 847.0135, 859.01, 876.32

Florida Administrative Code: 18-14.003, 18-21.003, 18-21.004, 18-21.005, 18-21.0051, 28-106.104, 28-106.216, 28-106.217, 61D-6.002, 62-110.106, 62-302.200, 62-302.300, 62-302.500, 62-302.530, 62-302.531, 62-302.532, 62-302.700, 62-302.800, 62-303.150, 62-303.351, 62-303.353, 62-303.354, 62-303.500, 62-330.417, 62-4.242, 62-4.244, 62D-2.014

96-003571 METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY vs REDD`S CLEANERS AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 31, 1996

The issue for determination is whether Redd’s Cleaners, DEP Facility No. 139502588 is eligible for state-administered cleanup under the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program pursuant to Section 376.3078, Florida Statutes.Dry cleaners did not operate in a grossly negligent manner, even though it failed to assess and remediate/eligible for dry cleaning cleanup program.

96-000602 JOSEPH L. CUTTER vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 31, 1996

The issues are: (1) whether Petitioner Joseph L. Cutter has a substantial interest in Respondent Department of Environmental Protection's adoption of the 1995 report entitled "Delineation of Ground and Surface Water Areas Potentially Impacted by an Industrial Discharge to the Fenholloway River of Taylor County, Florida"; (2) whether Respondent Department of Environmental Protection properly identified the area along the Fenholloway River where river water containing an industrial discharge may potentially impact ground and surface water; and (3) whether Buckeye Florida, L.P. has standing to participate as an Intervenor in this proceeding.Petitioner did not prove that his substantial interests were affected by DEP's adoption of a report showing area impacted by contaminated river water.

96-003708 MIAMI BEACH ROD AND REEL CLUB vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 1996

Whether Petitioner is entitled to a consent to use sovereign submerged lands.Applicant failed to meet standard as existing dock provides access and expansion not clearly in public interest.

19-000644 SIERRA CLUB vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2019)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 05, 2019

The issues to be determined in this matter are: (1) whether the five separate orders issued by the Secretary of DEP on June 29, 2018, adopting five basin management action plans (BMAPs) for the Suwannee River, the Volusia Blue Spring, the Silver Springs-Rainbow Spring Group, the Santa Fe River, and the Wekiwa Spring-Rock Springs, comply with the provisions of section 403.067, Florida Statutes, and the Florida Springs and Aquifer Protection Act, sections 373.801 through 373.813, Florida Statutes (the Act); and (2) whether Petitioners demonstrated that their substantial interests were affected and, therefore, have standing.The preponderance of the evidence established that the five BMAPs were valid because they were designed to achieve the TMDLs, as required by sections 373.807 and 403.067, and did implement the provisions of those laws.

19-000645 THOMAS GREENALGH vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2019)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 05, 2019

The issues to be determined in this matter are: (1) whether the five separate orders issued by the Secretary of DEP on June 29, 2018, adopting five basin management action plans (BMAPs) for the Suwannee River, the Volusia Blue Spring, the Silver Springs-Rainbow Spring Group, the Santa Fe River, and the Wekiwa Spring-Rock Springs, comply with the provisions of section 403.067, Florida Statutes, and the Florida Springs and Aquifer Protection Act, sections 373.801 through 373.813, Florida Statutes (the Act); and (2) whether Petitioners demonstrated that their substantial interests were affected and, therefore, have standing.The preponderance of the evidence established that the five BMAPs were valid because they were designed to achieve the TMDLs, as required by sections 373.807 and 403.067, and did implement the provisions of those laws.

19-000646 SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2019)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 05, 2019

The issues to be determined in this matter are: (1) whether the five separate orders issued by the Secretary of DEP on June 29, 2018, adopting five basin management action plans (BMAPs) for the Suwannee River, the Volusia Blue Spring, the Silver Springs-Rainbow Spring Group, the Santa Fe River, and the Wekiwa Spring-Rock Springs, comply with the provisions of section 403.067, Florida Statutes, and the Florida Springs and Aquifer Protection Act, sections 373.801 through 373.813, Florida Statutes (the Act); and (2) whether Petitioners demonstrated that their substantial interests were affected and, therefore, have standing.The preponderance of the evidence established that the five BMAPs were valid because they were designed to achieve the TMDLs, as required by sections 373.807 and 403.067, and did implement the provisions of those laws.

19-000647 SILVER SPRINGS ALLIANCE, INC., AND RAINBOW RIVER CONSERVATION, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2019)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 05, 2019

The issues to be determined in this matter are: (1) whether the five separate orders issued by the Secretary of DEP on June 29, 2018, adopting five basin management action plans (BMAPs) for the Suwannee River, the Volusia Blue Spring, the Silver Springs-Rainbow Spring Group, the Santa Fe River, and the Wekiwa Spring-Rock Springs, comply with the provisions of section 403.067, Florida Statutes, and the Florida Springs and Aquifer Protection Act, sections 373.801 through 373.813, Florida Statutes (the Act); and (2) whether Petitioners demonstrated that their substantial interests were affected and, therefore, have standing.The preponderance of the evidence established that the five BMAPs were valid because they were designed to achieve the TMDLs, as required by sections 373.807 and 403.067, and did implement the provisions of those laws.

19-000648 OUR SANTA FE RIVER, INC.; ICHETUCKNEE ALLIANCE, INC.; GINNIE SPRINGS OUTDOORS, LLC; AND JIM TATUM vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2019)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 05, 2019

The issues to be determined in this matter are: (1) whether the five separate orders issued by the Secretary of DEP on June 29, 2018, adopting five basin management action plans (BMAPs) for the Suwannee River, the Volusia Blue Spring, the Silver Springs-Rainbow Spring Group, the Santa Fe River, and the Wekiwa Spring-Rock Springs, comply with the provisions of section 403.067, Florida Statutes, and the Florida Springs and Aquifer Protection Act, sections 373.801 through 373.813, Florida Statutes (the Act); and (2) whether Petitioners demonstrated that their substantial interests were affected and, therefore, have standing.The preponderance of the evidence established that the five BMAPs were valid because they were designed to achieve the TMDLs, as required by sections 373.807 and 403.067, and did implement the provisions of those laws.

19-000649 PAUL STILL vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2019)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 05, 2019

The issues to be determined in this matter are: (1) whether the five separate orders issued by the Secretary of DEP on June 29, 2018, adopting five basin management action plans (BMAPs) for the Suwannee River, the Volusia Blue Spring, the Silver Springs-Rainbow Spring Group, the Santa Fe River, and the Wekiwa Spring-Rock Springs, comply with the provisions of section 403.067, Florida Statutes, and the Florida Springs and Aquifer Protection Act, sections 373.801 through 373.813, Florida Statutes (the Act); and (2) whether Petitioners demonstrated that their substantial interests were affected and, therefore, have standing.The preponderance of the evidence established that the five BMAPs were valid because they were designed to achieve the TMDLs, as required by sections 373.807 and 403.067, and did implement the provisions of those laws.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Ask a Question

Search for lawyers by practice areas.

Find a Lawyer