welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Karl David Acuff
Karl David Acuff
Karl David Acuff
Visitors: 82
0
Bar #587044(FL)     License for 23 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Karl David Acuff? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 42 USC 1396

CFR: 42 CFR 412, 42 CFR 413, 42 CFR 476

Florida Laws: 1.01, 120.52, 120.536, 120.54, 120.541, 120.542, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.595, 120.68, 159.40, 164.1041, 164.1051, 376.40, 393.0661, 393.0662, 408.031, 408.032, 408.033, 408.034, 408.035, 408.037, 408.039, 408.040, 408.042, 408.045, 408.0455, 408.7071, 409.901, 409.902, 409.913, 409.9131, 57.111, 768.28, 872.04, 95.011, 95.11

Florida Administrative Code: 59C-1.018, 59G-9.070

02-004036CON  BOCA RATON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION AND INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 15, 2002
02-004272CON  INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., D/B/A INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 01, 2002
01-002713CON  BOCA RATON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 23, 2001
The issues in this case are whether a need exists for the establishment of one or more new adult open heart surgery (OHS) programs in Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) Planning District 9, and, if so, whether the Certificate of Need (CON) applications filed by Boca Raton Community Hospital, Inc. (Boca), Martin Memorial Medical Center, Inc. (Martin), and/or Bethesda Healthcare System, Inc. (Bethesda), in March 2001, meet the statutory and rule criteria to satisfy that need.Petitioners Boca and Martin proved that their applications for a certificate of need approval to establish a new open heart surgery program in District 9, on balance, satisfies the applicable statutory and Rule criteria. Recommend application approval.
01-002715CON  BETHESDA HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 23, 2001
The issues in this case are whether a need exists for the establishment of one or more new adult open heart surgery (OHS) programs in Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) Planning District 9, and, if so, whether the Certificate of Need (CON) applications filed by Boca Raton Community Hospital, Inc. (Boca), Martin Memorial Medical Center, Inc. (Martin), and/or Bethesda Healthcare System, Inc. (Bethesda), in March 2001, meet the statutory and rule criteria to satisfy that need.Petitioners Boca and Martin proved that their applications for a certificate of need approval to establish a new open heart surgery program in District 9, on balance, satisfies the applicable statutory and Rule criteria. Recommend application approval.
01-002894CON  TENET HEALTHSYSTEM HOSPITALS, INC., D/B/A DELRAY MEDICAL CENTER vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 23, 2001
The issues in this case are whether a need exists for the establishment of one or more new adult open heart surgery (OHS) programs in Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) Planning District 9, and, if so, whether the Certificate of Need (CON) applications filed by Boca Raton Community Hospital, Inc. (Boca), Martin Memorial Medical Center, Inc. (Martin), and/or Bethesda Healthcare System, Inc. (Bethesda), in March 2001, meet the statutory and rule criteria to satisfy that need.Petitioners Boca and Martin proved that their applications for a certificate of need approval to establish a new open heart surgery program in District 9, on balance, satisfies the applicable statutory and Rule criteria. Recommend application approval.
01-002896CON  LAWNWOOD MEDICAL CENTER, INC., D/B/A LAWNWOOD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 23, 2001
The issues in this case are whether a need exists for the establishment of one or more new adult open heart surgery (OHS) programs in Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) Planning District 9, and, if so, whether the Certificate of Need (CON) applications filed by Boca Raton Community Hospital, Inc. (Boca), Martin Memorial Medical Center, Inc. (Martin), and/or Bethesda Healthcare System, Inc. (Bethesda), in March 2001, meet the statutory and rule criteria to satisfy that need.Petitioners Boca and Martin proved that their applications for a certificate of need approval to establish a new open heart surgery program in District 9, on balance, satisfies the applicable statutory and Rule criteria. Recommend application approval.
01-002897CON  COLUMBIA/JFK MEDICAL CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A JFK MEDICAL CENTER vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 23, 2001
The issues in this case are whether a need exists for the establishment of one or more new adult open heart surgery (OHS) programs in Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) Planning District 9, and, if so, whether the Certificate of Need (CON) applications filed by Boca Raton Community Hospital, Inc. (Boca), Martin Memorial Medical Center, Inc. (Martin), and/or Bethesda Healthcare System, Inc. (Bethesda), in March 2001, meet the statutory and rule criteria to satisfy that need.Petitioners Boca and Martin proved that their applications for a certificate of need approval to establish a new open heart surgery program in District 9, on balance, satisfies the applicable statutory and Rule criteria. Recommend application approval.
01-002898CON  COLUMBIA/JFK MEDICAL CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A JFK MEDICAL CENTER vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 23, 2001
The issues in this case are whether a need exists for the establishment of one or more new adult open heart surgery (OHS) programs in Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) Planning District 9, and, if so, whether the Certificate of Need (CON) applications filed by Boca Raton Community Hospital, Inc. (Boca), Martin Memorial Medical Center, Inc. (Martin), and/or Bethesda Healthcare System, Inc. (Bethesda), in March 2001, meet the statutory and rule criteria to satisfy that need.Petitioners Boca and Martin proved that their applications for a certificate of need approval to establish a new open heart surgery program in District 9, on balance, satisfies the applicable statutory and Rule criteria. Recommend application approval.
01-002913CON  MARTIN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 23, 2001
The issues in this case are whether a need exists for the establishment of one or more new adult open heart surgery (OHS) programs in Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) Planning District 9, and, if so, whether the Certificate of Need (CON) applications filed by Boca Raton Community Hospital, Inc. (Boca), Martin Memorial Medical Center, Inc. (Martin), and/or Bethesda Healthcare System, Inc. (Bethesda), in March 2001, meet the statutory and rule criteria to satisfy that need.Petitioners Boca and Martin proved that their applications for a certificate of need approval to establish a new open heart surgery program in District 9, on balance, satisfies the applicable statutory and Rule criteria. Recommend application approval.
21-000888CON  SEASONS HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OF PINELLAS COUNTY, LLC vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 09, 2021
Whether there is “an error in the Fixed Need Pool numbers” for hospice as calculated by the Agency for Health Care Administration (“AHCA”) pursuant to Florida Administrative Code Rule 59C-1.0355(4)(a), and as published by AHCA on February 5, 2021, pursuant to rule 59C-1.008(2)(a).Petitioners have failed to demonstrate that the FNP determination under challenge herein is in error. Not proper to consider "provisional" deaths data and VA hospice admissions.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer