Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Kathrin Francesca Plendl
Kathrin Francesca Plendl
Visitors: 68
0
Bar #765996(FL)     License for 37 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Kathrin Francesca Plendl? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

91-000485  BOARD OF MEDICINE vs BALAKRISHNA NAIR  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 23, 1991
The issue in this case is whether Respondent is guilty, with respect to two patients, of exercising influence within a patient-physician relationship for the purpose of engaging a patient in sexual activity, engaging in sexual misconduct in the practice of medicine, failing to practice medicine with the minimum standard of care by engaging the patients in sexual activity and performing inappropriate thermography, and failing to keep written medical records justifying the course of treatment of the patients. If Respondent is guilty of any of these allegations, another issue is what penalty should be imposed.Recommended $10,000.00 fine, refund of all fees billed, and two- year suspension for Respondent who fondled two patients.
94-004595  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs HENRY J. PETRILLO  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 18, 1994
The issue in this case is whether the Board of Osteopathic Medicine (the Board) should discipline the Respondent's license on charges alleged in an Administrative Complaint, AHCA Case No. 94-09207, filed against him on August 17, 1994.Petitioner did not prove violat of probation. Order not clear who Respondent had to have present when examining females. False statement on DEA application; no intent to deceive
94-002051  BOARD OF MEDICINE vs GRAYSON C. SNYDER  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 15, 1994
The issue for determination is whether Respondent, a licensed physician, committed violations of Chapter 458, Florida Statutes, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint, sufficient to justify the imposition of disciplinary sanctions against his license.Posing graphically sexual questions to young undressed female patients merit s license discipline, especially since the questions were not solicited.
93-005917  BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ASHOK HARIHAR BHAT  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 14, 1993
The issue in this case is whether the Board of Medicine should discipline the Respondent, Ashok Harihar Bhat, M.D., on charges of sexual misconduct in the practice of medicine on February 9, 1993.Administrative Complaint alleged sexual misconduct in practice of medicine. Evidence did not prove charges.
93-000117  BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ASHER A. PADEH  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 12, 1993
This is a license discipline case in which the Petitioner seeks to take disciplinary action against a medical doctor on the basis of alleged violations of paragraphs (m), (q), and (t) of Section 458.331(1), Florida Statutes. The violations charged relate to allegations that the Respondent improperly prescribed legend drugs, including controlled substances, and that he failed to keep certain records.Physician prescribing drugs to person who is not a patient is guilty of violating 458.331(1)(q). Evidence insufficient to prove other charges.
93-002640  BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JERRY J. NEMECEK  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 14, 1993
Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaints? If so, what disciplinary action should be taken against him?Doctor guilty of substandard care and treatment of 2 patients and of pleading no contest to crime directly related to practice of medicine.
93-004130F  ALI A. AZIMA vs BOARD OF MEDICINE  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 26, 1993
Whether Petitioner is entitled to attorney's fees and costs under Section 57.111, Florida Statutes, the Florida Equal Access To Justice Act. Whether Petitioner is entitled to attorney's fees under Section 120.57(1)(b)5., Florida Statutes.Although Petitoner established that he was a prevailing small business party, the Department met its burden to show that it was substantially justified.
93-001631F  VLADIMIR ROSENTHAL vs BOARD OF MEDICINE  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 29, 1993
This is a proceeding pursuant to the Florida Equal Access To Justice Act, Section 57.111, Florida Statutes, in which the only disputed issue is whether the agency was substantially justified in the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against the Petitioner, a licensed physician, in DOAH Case No. 91- 2815, DPR Case No. 89-10153.Where agency action to initiate disciplinary proceedings was substantially justified, Petitioner is not entitled to award of attorney fees under 57.111
93-002665  BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ALFRED OCTAVIUS BONATI, M.D.  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 17, 1993
The issue for consideration in this case is whether Respondent, Alfred O. Bonati's, license as a medical doctor in Florida should be disciplined because of the matters alleged in the Administrative Complaint filed herein.Failure of doctor to make incision large enough to make proper diagnosis in light of test results was below standard of care and supporting discipline.
93-005739  BOARD OF MEDICINE vs CHARLES H. KENT  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 08, 1993
Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaints? If so, what disciplinary action should be taken against him?Radiation oncologist guilty of failing to meet standard of care in adminis- tering post-mastectomy radiation therapy to two of his patients.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer