welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Linda Loomis Shelley
Linda Loomis Shelley
Linda Loomis Shelley
Visitors: 77
0
Bar #240621(FL)     License for 48 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Linda Loomis Shelley? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 16 U.S.C 1531, 33 U.S.C 1311, 33 U.S.C 1342, 33 USC 1342

CFR: 0 CFR 258, 40 CFR 258, 40 CFR 258.13, 40 CFR 258.14, 40 CFR 258.15, 40 CFR 258.15, 40 CFR 258.15, 40 CFR 258.15

Florida Laws: 11.011, 120.52, 120.536, 120.54, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.573, 120.595, 120.68, 163.3161, 163.3164, 163.3167, 163.3174, 163.3177, 163.31777, 163.3178, 163.3180, 163.3181, 163.3184, 163.3187, 163.3191, 163.3194, 163.3215, 163.3245, 163.3248, 171.0413, 171.062, 193.461, 20.11, 258.15, 287.012, 287.057, 334.044, 339.05, 35.22, 377.25, 380.04, 380.0551, 403.088, 403.0885, 403.412, 403.707, 420.5095, 479.01, 479.015, 479.02, 479.07, 487.051, 57.105, 627.706, 823.14

Florida Administrative Code: 62-701.200, 62-701.220, 62-701.320, 62-701.340, 62-701.400, 62-701.410, 9J-5.002, 9J-5.005, 9J-5.006

1D09-6374  Cook v. State  (2010)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jun. 02, 2010 Citations: 37 So. 3d 851
37 So. 3d 851 (2010) COOK v. STATE. No. 1D09-6374. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. June 2, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Belated Appeal denied.
1D07-5314  Mims v. State  (2009)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 04, 2009 Citations: 5 So. 3d 673
5 So. 3d 673 (2009) MIMS v. STATE. No. 1D07-5314. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. March 4, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
13-003397GM  MIDBROOK 1ST REALTY CORPORATION vs MARTIN COUNTY  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 12, 2013
Whether Martin County Comprehensive Plan Amendment 13-5, adopted by Ordinance 938 on August 13, 2013, as amended by Ordinance 957 on July 8, 2014, is “in compliance,” as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2014).1/Plan Amendment is not "in compliance" where the methodology used to calculate demand and supply of residential housing was neither based on data and analysis nor professionally acceptable.
14-000135GM  MIDBROOK 1ST REALTY CORP. vs MARTIN COUNTY  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 10, 2014
Plan Amendment is not "in compliance" where the methodology used to calculate demand and supply of residential housing was neither based on data and analysis nor professionally acceptable.
15-000300GM  MARTIN COUNTY LAND CO. vs MARTIN COUNTY  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 15, 2015
Whether Martin County Comprehensive Plan Amendment 14-6, adopted by Ordinance No. 965 on December 16, 2014, is "in compliance," as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2014).1/Petitioner did not prove beyond fair debate that the plan amendment was not "in compliance" as that term is defined in 163.3184(1)(b), Fla. Stat.
09-001543  ANGELO'S AGGREGATE MATERIALS, LTD., D/B/A ANGELO'S RECYCLED MATERIALS vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 23, 2009
The issue to be determined in this proceeding is whether Angelo's Aggregate Materials, LTD ("Angelo's") is entitled to permits from the Department of Environmental Protection ("Department") to construct and operate a Class I landfill in Pasco County.The applicant for construction and operation permits for a Class I landfill failed to provide reasonable assurance that the proposed landfill would meet all applicable permitting criteria.
09-001544  CARL ROTH, JOHN FLOYD, LOUIS POTENZIANO, AND MARVIN HILL vs ANGELO`S AGGREGATE MATERIALS, LTD., D/B/A ANGELO`S RECYCLED MATERIALS AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 23, 2009
The issue to be determined in this proceeding is whether Angelo's Aggregate Materials, LTD ("Angelo's") is entitled to permits from the Department of Environmental Protection ("Department") to construct and operate a Class I landfill in Pasco County.The applicant for construction and operation permits for a Class I landfill failed to provide reasonable assurance that the proposed landfill would meet all applicable permitting criteria.
09-001545  WRB ENTERPRISES, INC. vs ANGELO`S AGGREGATE MATERIALS, LTD., D/B/A ANGELO`S RECYCLED MATERIALS AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 23, 2009
The issue to be determined in this proceeding is whether Angelo's Aggregate Materials, LTD ("Angelo's") is entitled to permits from the Department of Environmental Protection ("Department") to construct and operate a Class I landfill in Pasco County.The applicant for construction and operation permits for a Class I landfill failed to provide reasonable assurance that the proposed landfill would meet all applicable permitting criteria.
09-001546  NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA, INC. vs ANGELO`S AGGREGATE MATERIALS, LTD., D/B/A ANGELO`S RECYCLED MATERIALS AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 23, 2009
The issue to be determined in this proceeding is whether Angelo's Aggregate Materials, LTD ("Angelo's") is entitled to permits from the Department of Environmental Protection ("Department") to construct and operate a Class I landfill in Pasco County.The applicant for construction and operation permits for a Class I landfill failed to provide reasonable assurance that the proposed landfill would meet all applicable permitting criteria.
10-002419GM  BARBARA HERRIN AND EDGEWATER CITIZENS ALLIANCE FOR RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT, INC. vs VOLUSIA COUNTY; MIAMI CORPORATION; AND VOLUSIA GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMISSION  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 04, 2010
Whether the FLP is "in compliance" as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2011).1/Volusia County's Farmton Local Plan and remediated amendments to its comprehensive plan should be determined to be "in compliance" under the 2011 Community Planning Act.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer