Leon FL Administrative law, Election campaigns and political -- eLawyers - eLawyers.us

Linda Loomis Shelley

Linda Loomis Shelley

Visitors: 74

0

Bar #240621(FL) License for 48 years; Member in Good Standing

Tallahassee FL

Are you Linda Loomis Shelley? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 16 U.S.C 1531, 33 U.S.C 1311, 33 U.S.C 1342, 33 USC 1342

CFR: 0 CFR 258, 40 CFR 258, 40 CFR 258.13, 40 CFR 258.14, 40 CFR 258.15, 40 CFR 258.15, 40 CFR 258.15, 40 CFR 258.15

Florida Laws: 11.011, 120.52, 120.536, 120.54, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.573, 120.595, 120.68, 163.3161, 163.3164, 163.3167, 163.3174, 163.3177, 163.31777, 163.3178, 163.3180, 163.3181, 163.3184, 163.3187, 163.3191, 163.3194, 163.3215, 163.3245, 163.3248, 171.0413, 171.062, 193.461, 20.11, 258.15, 287.012, 287.057, 334.044, 339.05, 35.22, 377.25, 380.04, 380.0551, 403.088, 403.0885, 403.412, 403.707, 420.5095, 479.01, 479.015, 479.02, 479.07, 487.051, 57.105, 627.706, 823.14

Florida Administrative Code: 62-701.200, 62-701.220, 62-701.320, 62-701.340, 62-701.400, 62-701.410, 9J-5.002, 9J-5.005, 9J-5.006

11-002527GM SIERRA CLUB, INC., AND BARBARA HERRIN vs VOLUSIA COUNTY (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 17, 2011

Volusia County's Farmton Local Plan and remediated amendments to its comprehensive plan should be determined to be "in compliance" under the 2011 Community Planning Act.

10-000913GM MARTIN COUNTY CONSERVATION ALLIANCE, INC., A FLORIDA NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORP.; DONNA MELZER AND ELIZA ACKERLY, INDIVIDUALS AND GROVE HOLDINGS, LLC; GROVES 12, LLC; AND GROVES 14 LLC, vs |MARTIN COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 22, 2010

The issues to be determined in this case are whether the amendments to the Martin County Comprehensive Growth Management Plan (CGMP) adopted by Ordinance Nos. 843, 845 (as amended by Ordinance No. 847), 846, 847, 851, 853, and 854 are “in compliance” as that term is defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.1/It is recommended that all but two of the plan amendments adopted by Martin County be determined "in compliance."

10-001142GM GROVES HOLDINGS, LLC, GROVES 12, LLC, AND GROVES 14, LLC vs MARTIN COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 08, 2010

It is recommended that all but two of the plan amendments adopted by Martin County be determined "in compliance."

10-001161GM MARTIN COUNTY CONSERVATION ALLIANCE, INC., A FLORIDA NON-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION, AND DONNA MELZER vs MARTIN COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 09, 2010

It is recommended that all but two of the plan amendments adopted by Martin County be determined "in compliance."

10-001162GM MARTIN COUNTY CONSERVATION ALLIANCE, INC., A FLORIDA NON-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION, AND DONNA MELZER vs MARTIN COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 09, 2010

It is recommended that all but two of the plan amendments adopted by Martin County be determined "in compliance."

10-001163GM MARTIN COUNTY CONSERVATION ALLIANCE, INC., A FLORIDA NON-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION, AND DONNA MELZER vs MARTIN COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 09, 2010

It is recommended that all but two of the plan amendments adopted by Martin County be determined "in compliance."

10-001164GM MARTIN COUNTY CONSERVATION ALLIANCE, INC., A FLORIDA NON-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION, AND DONNA MELZER vs MARTIN COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 09, 2010

It is recommended that all but two of the plan amendments adopted by Martin County be determined "in compliance."

08-003614GM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS vs MIAMI-DADE COUNTY (2008)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 22, 2008

The issue in this case is whether the amendments to Miami- Dade County’s Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP), adopted through Ordinance Nos. 08-44 and 08-45, are “in compliance” as that term is defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2008).1The County`s adoption of Ordinance 08-44 (Lowe`s Amendment) is not in compliance. The County`s adoption of Ordinance No. 08-45 is in compliance.

05-002804BID HEMOPHILIA HEALTH SERVICES, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 03, 2005

The issue in this case is whether the proposed award of contracts by the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) to Caremark, Inc. (Caremark), and Lynnfield Drugs, Inc., d/b/a Hemophilia of the Sunshine State (Lynnfield), pursuant to AHCA's Request For Proposal (RFP) 0507, was contrary to AHCA's governing statutes, AHCA's rules or policies, or the solicitation specifications.Respondent`s award of contracts was not shown to be clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious. Petitioner would not have been awarded a contract even in the absence of the errors that were proven.

02-002676GM DAVID AND DECEMBER MCSHERRY; DWIGHT ADAMS; AND SUSTAINABLE ALACHUA COUNTY, INC. vs ALACHUA COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 05, 2002

The issue in these cases is whether the Alachua County Comprehensive Plan amendments adopted through Alachua County Ordinance Number 03-05 on August 26, 2003, are "in compliance," as defined in Subsection 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2003).Petitioner failed to prove beyond "fair debate" that the 2003 Amendments to Alachua County`s Plan were not "in compliance" with the relevant statutory and rule requirements.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Ask a Question

Search for lawyers by practice areas.

Find a Lawyer