Leon FL Administrative law, Election campaigns and political -- eLawyers

02-001014GM DONNA MELZER AND MARTIN COUNTY CONSERVATION ALLIANCE, INC. vs MARTIN COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 11, 2002

Whether Martin County Comprehensive Plan Amendments Nos. 01-11 and 01-12, pertaining to school siting and public facilities, adopted by Martin County in Ordinance No. 606, on December 11, 2001, are "in compliance," as that term is defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes. (All citations to Florida Statutes are to the 2001 version unless otherwise stated.)School siting and public facility plan amendments adopted by Martin County were subject to fair debate and therefore "in" compliance with applicable provisions of Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code.

02-001015GM LLOYD BRUMFIELD AND 1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA, INC. vs MARTIN COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 11, 2002

Whether Martin County Comprehensive Plan Amendments Nos. 01-11 and 01-12, pertaining to school siting and public facilities, adopted by Martin County in Ordinance No. 606, on December 11, 2001, are "in compliance," as that term is defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes. (All citations to Florida Statutes are to the 2001 version unless otherwise stated.)School siting and public facility plan amendments adopted by Martin County were subject to fair debate and therefore "in" compliance with applicable provisions of Chapter 16, Part II, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code.

04-000017BID HEMOPHILIA HEALTH SERVICES vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 05, 2004

The issue in these cases is whether the Agency for Health Care Administration's (AHCA) proposed award of a contract to Caremark, Inc., based on evaluations of proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposals (RFP), is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Respondent`s failure to evaluate cost proposals according to the Request for Proposals method is clearly erroneous, arbitrary, and capricious.

04-000018BID LYNNFIELD DRUGS, INC., D/B/A HEMOPHILIA OF THE SUNSHINE STATE vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 05, 2004

The issue in these cases is whether the Agency for Health Care Administration's (AHCA) proposed award of a contract to Caremark, Inc., based on evaluations of proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposals (RFP), is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Respondent`s failure to evaluate cost proposals according to the Request for Proposals method is clearly erroneous, arbitrary, and capricious.

02-000340PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ALEXANDER D. J. BRICKLER, III, M.D. (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 25, 2002

Should Petitioner discipline Respondent's license to practice medicine?Respondent improperly identified the patient and performed a procedure without advance consent.

02-001721BID COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 01, 2002

The issue to be resolved in this proceeding concerns whether the rejection of Petitioner Compaq Computer Corporation's (Compaq) submission in response to an invitation to negotiate #01/02-31 for the Child Support Enforcement (CSE) Automated Management Systems (CAMS) case management informational technology system is "clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious." Embodied within that general issue are the considerations of whether the proposal by Compaq was responsive and whether the submittal by Compaq of a "Form 7105," with the absence of the vendor certification purportedly required on the front, or first page of that form, and the signature by the representative of Compaq in a signature area designated for an agency representative is a material irregularity.Petitioner demonstrated that submitting only 2 of 3 required pages of form PUR7105, with vendor certification signature in wrong location, was not a material irregularity and which caused no competitive advantage to Petitioner.

01-001949 SAVE OUR BAYS, AIR AND CANALS, INC. vs TAMPA BAY DESAL AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 18, 2001

There are two issues in these cases: (1) whether Tampa Bay Desal, LLC ("TBD") provided reasonable assurances that its permit application to discharge wastewater from a proposed seawater desalination plant, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") Permit Application No. FL0186813- 001-IWIS, meets all applicable state permitting standards for industrial wastewater facilities; and (2) whether Tampa Electric Company, Inc. (TEC) provided reasonable assurances that its proposed modification to an existing industrial wastewater facility permit, NPDES Permit Modification No. FL0000817-003-IWIS, meets all applicable state permitting standards.Application for industrial wastewater permit for desalination plant using power plant`s once-through cooling water provided reasonable assurance of compliance with permit requirements.

01-002720 SAVE OUR BAYS, AIR AND CANALS, INC. vs TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 11, 2001

There are two issues in these cases: (1) whether Tampa Bay Desal, LLC ("TBD") provided reasonable assurances that its permit application to discharge wastewater from a proposed seawater desalination plant, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") Permit Application No. FL0186813- 001-IWIS, meets all applicable state permitting standards for industrial wastewater facilities; and (2) whether Tampa Electric Company, Inc. (TEC) provided reasonable assurances that its proposed modification to an existing industrial wastewater facility permit, NPDES Permit Modification No. FL0000817-003-IWIS, meets all applicable state permitting standards.Application for industrial wastewater permit for desalination plant using power plant`s once-through cooling water provided reasonable assurance of compliance with permit requirements.

90-003409DRI FL-GA VENTURE GROUP vs CITY OF ORMOND BEACH (HUNTER`S RIDGE) (1990)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 01, 1990

The ultimate issue is whether the Applicant, Florida-Georgia Venture Group, is entitled to development orders for its proposed development of regional impact, Hunter's Ridge, in Flagler County and the City of Ormond Beach, Florida.Development consistent with rule and statutory standards. Entitled to development order with conditions.

Linda Loomis Shelley