welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Linda McDermott
Linda McDermott
Linda McDermott
Visitors: 124
0
Bar #102857(FL)     License for 28 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Linda McDermott? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

  Coulson v. Herr  (1929)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 15, 1929 Citations: 124 So. 736, 98 Fla. 622
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affi..
  Coulson v. Herr  (1929)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 15, 1929 Citations: 124 So. 736, 98 Fla. 622
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affi..
  Coulson v. Herr  (1929)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 15, 1929 Citations: 124 So. 736, 98 Fla. 622
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affi..
  Ansberry v. Hughes  (1936)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jul. 05, 1936 Citations: 125 Fla. 908, 169 So. 918
Appeal dismissed on motion of counsel for Appellants.
  Garriga v. Reid Lumber Co.  (1929)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Mar. 05, 1929 Citations: 120 So. 849, 97 Fla. 321
The appellee filed suit in the Circuit Court of Gulf County against the appellants, the purpose of which was to obtain a temporary injunction and upon final hearing a decree of perpetual injunction. The bill alleged in substance that on April 20th, 1927, complainants sold to the defendants timber of certain lands described in the bill of complaint for $72,453.75, payable $5,000.00 cash and the balance evidenced by promissory notes of the defendants payable to the order of the complainants every 6..
  Garriga v. Reid Lumber Co.  (1929)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Mar. 05, 1929 Citations: 120 So. 849, 97 Fla. 321
The appellee filed suit in the Circuit Court of Gulf County against the appellants, the purpose of which was to obtain a temporary injunction and upon final hearing a decree of perpetual injunction. The bill alleged in substance that on April 20th, 1927, complainants sold to the defendants timber of certain lands described in the bill of complaint for $72,453.75, payable $5,000.00 cash and the balance evidenced by promissory notes of the defendants payable to the order of the complainants every 6..
  The Travis Co. v. Peacock Holding Co., Inc.  (1938)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jun. 15, 1938 Citations: 132 Fla. 811, 182 So. 213
The above cause having been submitted upon the transcript of record and the briefs and argument of counsel, the Court, having duly considered the questions involved, is of the opinion that there is no reversible error in the record, and the final decree appealed from is affirmed. WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BROWN, and CHAPMAN, J.J., concur. BUFORD, J., dissents.
  The Travis Co. v. Peacock Holding Co., Inc.  (1938)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jun. 15, 1938 Citations: 132 Fla. 811, 182 So. 213
The above cause having been submitted upon the transcript of record and the briefs and argument of counsel, the Court, having duly considered the questions involved, is of the opinion that there is no reversible error in the record, and the final decree appealed from is affirmed. WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BROWN, and CHAPMAN, J.J., concur. BUFORD, J., dissents.
  Spafford v. Brevard County, Florida  (1926)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Aug. 11, 1926
The Constitution of this State provides that: "No person shall be * * * deprived of * * * property without due process of law." Sec. 12, Declaration of Rights. "No private property nor right of way shall be appropriated to the use of any corporation or individual until *Page 619 full compensation therefor shall be first made to the owner, or first secured to him by deposit of money; which compensation, irrespective of any benefit from any improvement proposed by such corporation or individual, sh..
  Spafford v. Brevard County, Florida  (1926)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Aug. 11, 1926
The Constitution of this State provides that: "No person shall be * * * deprived of * * * property without due process of law." Sec. 12, Declaration of Rights. "No private property nor right of way shall be appropriated to the use of any corporation or individual until *Page 619 full compensation therefor shall be first made to the owner, or first secured to him by deposit of money; which compensation, irrespective of any benefit from any improvement proposed by such corporation or individual, sh..

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer