Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Manuel Farach
Manuel Farach
Visitors: 77
1
Bar #612138(FL)     License for 39 years; Member in Good Standing
Fort Lauderdale FL

Are you Manuel Farach? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

1D11-3010  Skolnick v. State  (2011)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Oct. 10, 2011 Citations: 72 So. 3d 754
72 So. 3d 754 (2011) SKOLNICK v. STATE. No. 1D11-3010. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. October 10, 2011. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.
67-298-Civ-J  Adderly v. Wainwright  (1967)
District Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Aug. 09, 1967 Citations: 272 F. Supp. 530
272 F. Supp. 530 (1967) John Alfred ADDERLY, John Henry Roberts, Joseph Montgomery, James E. Collins, Thomas Allen, Henry J. Carswell, and all other persons similarly situated, Petitioners, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent. No. 67-298-Civ-J. United States District Court M. D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. August 9, 1967. Anthony G. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, Pa., Tobias Simon, American Civil Liberties Union, Miami, Fla., for petitioners. Earl..
89-125-Civ-Oc-16  ARONOV REALTY CO. v. Title Ins. Co. of Minnesota  (1989)
District Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Dec. 14, 1989 Citations: 730 F. Supp. 406
730 F. Supp. 406 (1989) ARONOV REALTY COMPANY, INC., etc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF MINNESOTA, etc., et al., Defendants. No. 89-125-Civ-Oc-16. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Ocala Division. December 14, 1989. Steven H. Gray, Green and Simmons, P.A., Ocala, Fla., for plaintiffs. Jeffrey C. Regan, Rogers, Towers, Bailey, Jones & Gay, Jacksonville, Fla., and Russell W. LaPeer and John P. McKeever, Ocala, Fla., for defendants. *407 ORDER JOHN H. MOORE, II, Distri..
1D09-5189  Pitts v. State  (2010)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jan. 19, 2010 Citations: 26 So. 3d 585
26 So. 3d 585 (2010) PITTS v. STATE. No. 1D09-5189. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. January 19, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.
5D10-1376  State v. Murray  (2011)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jan. 07, 2011 Citations: 51 So. 3d 593
51 So. 3d 593 (2011) STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Daniel L. MURRAY and James L. Brink, Appellee. No. 5D10-1376. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. January 7, 2011. *594 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. J. Brian Page, of DeCarlis, Sawyer & Alba, PL, Gainesville, for Appellee, Daniel L. Murray. No appearance for Appellee, James L. Brink. ORFINGER, J. While allegedly street racing,..
74-960  Jones v. Wainwright  (1974)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Aug. 09, 1974 Citations: 298 So. 2d 542
298 So. 2d 542 (1974) Larry C. JONES, Relator, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, and David T. King, Captain, Road Prison No. 27, Respondents. No. 74-960. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. August 9, 1974. Larry C. Jones, pro se. MANN, Chief Judge. Jones is incarcerated in Road Prison No. 27, of which the respondent King is Captain. Respondent Wainwright is Director of the Division of Corrections in the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. W..
5D05-3182  Eusepi v. Magruder Eye Institute  (2006)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Sep. 15, 2006 Citations: 937 So. 2d 795
937 So. 2d 795 (2006) Joyce EUSEPI, etc., et al., Appellant, v. MAGRUDER EYE INSTITUTE, et al., Appellee. No. 5D05-3182. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. September 15, 2006. *796 Ricardo L. Carmona, of Ricardo L. Carmona, P.A., Coral Gables, for Appellant. Vance R. Dawson, and Laura B. Floyd, of Rissman, Weisberg, Barrett, Hurt, Donahue McLain, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee. GRIFFIN, J. Joyce Eusepi ["Eusepi"], individually and as personal representative of the estate of her hus..
90-001734  SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT vs CANOE CREEK PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., AND DEAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 20, 1990
The South Florida Water Management District (District) filed this proceeding against Canoe Creek Property Owners Association, Inc., and its predecessor in title, Dean Development Company, Inc., to require modifications in the surface water management system of Canoe Creek. Dean Development failed to participate in the case. There are disputes between the Property Owners Association and the Canoe Creek developer over whether the system has been turned over to the property owners. Those disputes must be resolved elsewhere. Canoe Creek is a mature 86.5 acre residential subdivision. It is immediately east of and adjacent to Westwood Country Estates, an 82.1 acre residential development which is in the early stages of development. This action is the second of two related proceedings initiated by the District. The prior matter began in August 1988 when the District issued a Notice Of Violation to Westwood Country Estates, Inc. (Westwood), claiming it had made an unauthorized discharge of storm water which had an adverse impact on Bessey Creek. Westwood's unauthorized discharge occurred after a storm event, when the berm along Westwood's southern boundary failed, and surface water began to flow south from that breach into Bessey Creek. As part of the resolution of the Notice Of Violation proceeding, Westwood filed, on or about October 14, 1988, an application with the District to modify its surface water management system. Westwood's consulting engineer had determined, when preparing the permit modification application, that an additional 52 acres of land immediately to the west of Westwood drained onto Westwood, and that the water from that land needed to be incorporated into the Westwood surface water management system. At Westwood's eastern boundary is a north/south berm which separates it from Canoe Creek; there is a weir structure at about the mid-point of the berm, which has been permitted by the District.Water management district could modify permit to require downstream landowners to handle additional water flows which had been overlooked when permit first granted

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer