welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Michael Joseph Glazer
Michael Joseph Glazer
Michael Joseph Glazer
Visitors: 88
0
Bar #286508(FL)     License for 46 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Michael Joseph Glazer? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

14-001398BID  PINNACLE RIO, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 2014
The issue for determination is whether Respondent's intended decision to award low-income housing tax credits in Miami-Dade County through Request for Applications 2013-003 to HTG Miami-Dade 5, LLC, and Allapattah Trace Apartments, Ltd., is contrary to governing statutes, the corporation’s rules or policies, or the solicitation specifications.Respondent's determination that Petitioner APC Four Forty Four was ineligible was clearly erroneous, but Petitioners failed to prove Respondent's intended allocation of tax credits was contrary to governing statutes, rules, or solicitation specifications.
14-001399BID  PINNACLE RIO, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 2014
The issue for determination is whether Respondent's intended decision to award low-income housing tax credits in Miami-Dade County through Request for Applications 2013-003 to HTG Miami-Dade 5, LLC, and Allapattah Trace Apartments, Ltd., is contrary to governing statutes, the corporation’s rules or policies, or the solicitation specifications.Respondent's determination that Petitioner APC Four Forty Four was ineligible was clearly erroneous, but Petitioners failed to prove Respondent's intended allocation of tax credits was contrary to governing statutes, rules, or solicitation specifications.
14-001400BID  TOWN CENTER PHASE TWO, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 2014
The issue for determination is whether Respondent's intended decision to award low-income housing tax credits in Miami-Dade County through Request for Applications 2013-003 to HTG Miami-Dade 5, LLC, and Allapattah Trace Apartments, Ltd., is contrary to governing statutes, the corporation’s rules or policies, or the solicitation specifications.Respondent's determination that Petitioner APC Four Forty Four was ineligible was clearly erroneous, but Petitioners failed to prove Respondent's intended allocation of tax credits was contrary to governing statutes, rules, or solicitation specifications.
14-001428BID  APC FOUR FORTY FOUR, LTD. vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 2014
The issue for determination is whether Respondent's intended decision to award low-income housing tax credits in Miami-Dade County through Request for Applications 2013-003 to HTG Miami-Dade 5, LLC, and Allapattah Trace Apartments, Ltd., is contrary to governing statutes, the corporation’s rules or policies, or the solicitation specifications.Respondent's determination that Petitioner APC Four Forty Four was ineligible was clearly erroneous, but Petitioners failed to prove Respondent's intended allocation of tax credits was contrary to governing statutes, rules, or solicitation specifications.
13-004113BID  CARE ACCESS PSN, LLC vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 17, 2013
The issues in this bid protest are whether, in making the decision to award Intervenor Prestige Health Choice, LLC ("Prestige"), a contract to provide Medicaid managed medical assistance services as a provider service network in Region 11 (covering Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties), Respondent Agency for Health Care Administration ("AHCA") acted contrary to a governing statute, rule, or solicitation specification; and, if so, whether such action was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious. (In this protest, Petitioner Care Access PSN, LLC ("Care Access"), challenges AHCA's intended award to Prestige in Region 11, and only that award. Care Access does not seek to upset any other intended awards in Region 11 or in any other Region.)The agency's intended contract award, being contrary to the statutes and project specifications, is clearly erroneous and should be rescinded.
13-000706BID  LITTLE HAVANA ACTIVITIES AND NUTRITION CENTERS OF DADE COUNTY, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 22, 2013
The issues in the case are (1) whether the decision of the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) to not select Little Havana Activities and Nutrition Centers of Dade County, Inc. (Little Havana), for the award of a contract for the provision of long-term care managed care services pursuant to AHCA Invitation to Negotiation Solicitation No. AHCA ITN 011- 12/13, entitled "Statewide Medicaid Managed Care--Long Term Care, Region 11" (ITN) was contrary to the AHCA's governing statutes, rules, polices or any applicable ITN specification, and, if so, whether such selection decision was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious; whether Little Havana's response to the ITN was responsive; whether Little Havana was a responsible vendor; and (4) whether Little Havana's protest is barred for failure to submit the required protest bond.Protestor did not have standing to protest contract awards because it was neither responsive nor responsible.
12-000428CON  COLUMBIA HOSPITAL (PALM BEACHES) LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A WEST PALM HOSPITAL, AND JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER, INC., D/B/A JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER vs FLORIDA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. AND AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 27, 2012
Whether Certificate of Need (CON) Application No. 10130, filed by Florida Regional Medical Center (FRMC) for an 80-bed acute-care hospital in Palm Beach County, Florida, Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) health planning district 9, sub-district 9-4, satisfies, on balance, the applicable statutory and rule criteria.Applicant failed to demonstrate need for its proposed hospital; evidence submitted did not satisfy, on balance, the applicable statutory and rule criteria; needs of research and educational facilities are no longer considered in CON review.
12-000496CON  JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER, INC., D/B/A JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 03, 2012
Whether Certificate of Need (CON) Application No. 10130, filed by Florida Regional Medical Center (FRMC) for an 80-bed acute-care hospital in Palm Beach County, Florida, Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) health planning district 9, sub-district 9-4, satisfies, on balance, the applicable statutory and rule criteria.Applicant failed to demonstrate need for its proposed hospital; evidence submitted did not satisfy, on balance, the applicable statutory and rule criteria; needs of research and educational facilities are no longer considered in CON review.
12-000340BID  CYPRESS CARE, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 23, 2012
04-002810CON  HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 11, 2004
The issue is whether Petitioner’s application for a Certificate of Need to establish a new 84-bed acute care hospital in Viera should be approved.The Certificate of Need application for a new 84-bed hospital in Viera, Florida, should be denied because Petitioner failed to prove that the hospital is needed.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer