welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Paul J. Kneski
Paul J. Kneski
Paul J. Kneski
Visitors: 47
8
Bar #260770(FL)     License for 47 years; Member in Good Standing
Plantation FL

Are you Paul J. Kneski? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

5D00-342  Nants v. Griffin  (2001)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 04, 2001 Citations: 783 So. 2d 363
783 So. 2d 363 (2001) Cynthia F. NANTS and Bruce A. Nants, etc., Appellants, v. Geraldine GRIFFIN and State Farm Insurance, etc., Appellee. No. 5D00-342. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. May 4, 2001. *364 R. Lee Dorough, Orlando, for Appellants. Elizabeth C. Wheeler of Wheeler & Wilkinson, LLP, Orlando, for Appellee. PETERSON, J. Cynthia and Bruce Nants appeal a final judgment awarding attorney's fees to Geraldine Griffin. Attorney's fees were awardable pursuant to section 768..
2D09-286  TERMINIX INTERN. CO., LP v. Trenary  (2009)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 22, 2009 Citations: 8 So. 3d 1143
8 So. 3d 1143 (2009) TERMINIX INTERN. CO., L.P. v. TRENARY. No. 2D09-286. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. May 22, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
58-418  Snipes v. City of Hialeah  (1959)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Aug. 24, 1959 Citations: 114 So. 2d 214
114 So. 2d 214 (1959) E.F. SNIPES and Juanita C. Snipes, his wife, Appellants, v. CITY OF HIALEAH, a municipal corporation, Appellee. No. 58-418. District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District. August 24, 1959. Richard P. Kenney, Miami, for appellants. Ralph C. Nelson, Hialeah, for appellee. KNOTT, JAMES R., Associate Judge. Appellants, as plaintiffs below, initiated a suit to enjoin appellee city from enforcing an R-1 (single family residential) zoning restriction. The lower court found the..
16-002567  M AND B LAWN MAINTENANCE SERVICE, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 06, 2016
Whether Petitioner's conduct, omissions or actions in failing to execute and provide required documentation regarding roadway maintenance contracts awarded by Respondent, warrants a finding that Petitioner is "non-responsible" for a two-year period and prohibited from contracting with the state for that period of time.Petitioner's conduct in not signing or providing documents concerning mowing contracts awarded by DOT, did not justify finding Petitioner non-responsible, particularly in light of DOT's discontinuation of payments on another contract with Petitioner.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer