welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Robert Hillard Hosay
Robert Hillard Hosay
Robert Hillard Hosay
Visitors: 76
1
License for 26 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Robert Hillard Hosay? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

10-009969BID  KEYSTONE PEER REVIEW ORGANIZATION, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 29, 2010
The issue in this proceeding is whether the intended action of Respondent, Agency for Health Care Administration, to award a contract to Intervenor, eQHealthSolutions, Inc., is contrary to the agency's governing statutes, the agency's rules or policies, or the solicitation specifications. The standard of proof for this proceeding is whether the proposed agency action is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Award of contract to vendor w/ $12 million more costly reply to Invitation to Negotiate wasn't contrary to governing statutes, rules, & policies and was not clearly erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to competition. Law when ITN issues governs.
09-002577BID  MHM CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 14, 2009
The issues are as follows: (a) whether Respondent Department of Corrections (the Department) properly determined that there were no responsive proposals to the Request for Proposals entitled Mental Healthcare Services in Region IV, RFP #08-DC-8048 (the RFP); (b) whether the Department's intended award of a contract to provide mental healthcare services to inmates in Region IV to Intervenor Correctional Medical Services, Inc. (CMS), pursuant to Section 287.057(6), Florida Statutes (2008), is unlawful; and (c) whether Petitioner MHM Correctional Services, Inc. (MHM), has standing to challenge the Department's intended award of a contract to CMS pursuant to Section 287.057(6), Florida Statutes (2008).Petitioner did not prove that its proposal was responsive or that the Department improperly decided to negotiate on the best terms and conditions pursuant to Section 287.057(6), Florida Statutes.
20-002660BID  GATEWAY RETAIL CENTER vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 11, 2020
Whether the Department of Children and Families’ (“the Department”) intent to award the contract associated with Invitation to Negotiate No. 590:3161 (“the ITN”) to Midtown Centre Office, LLC (“Midtown”) was arbitrary or capricious, irrational, or otherwise contrary to the law.1Gateway has not carried its burden of demonstrating that the Department's intended award to Midtown is arbitrary or capricious.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer