welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Scott Gavin
Scott Gavin
Scott Gavin
Visitors: 71
0
Bar #58651(FL)     License for 17 years; Member in Good Standing
Fort Lauderdale FL

Are you Scott Gavin? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

  Jones v. Frederick, Judge  (1936)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jul. 05, 1936 Citations: 127 Fla. 902
Cause dismissed by order of Court.
  Haimovitz v. Robb  (1937)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Dec. 20, 1937 Citations: 130 Fla. 844, 178 So. 827
The appeal brings for review the final decree in favor of the complainant in a suit the purpose of which was to compel specific performance of contract to convey certain real estate and to adjudicate compensation for any deficiency in the subject matter of the contract. The appellant has stated what he terms to be five questions to be determined by this Court. The questions as presented in nowise comply with amended Rule 20. The five questions as stated might be restated as one, "Was the evidence..
  Haimovitz v. Robb  (1937)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Dec. 20, 1937 Citations: 130 Fla. 844, 178 So. 827
The appeal brings for review the final decree in favor of the complainant in a suit the purpose of which was to compel specific performance of contract to convey certain real estate and to adjudicate compensation for any deficiency in the subject matter of the contract. The appellant has stated what he terms to be five questions to be determined by this Court. The questions as presented in nowise comply with amended Rule 20. The five questions as stated might be restated as one, "Was the evidence..
Case No. 2395.  Sholtz v. State  (1936)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: May 09, 1936 Citations: 124 Fla. 267, 169 So. 50
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, *Page 268 ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the sam..
  Cowan v. Cowan  (1941)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jun. 10, 1941 Citations: 147 Fla. 473, 2 So. 2d 869
Appellant filed his bill for divorce alleging habitual intemperance on the part of defendant. Appellee answered with a cross bill denying the allegations as to intemperance and countering with a charge of cruelty on the part of complainant. On final hearing, the chancellor granted complainant a divorce and the cross complainant fifteen dollars per month permanent alimony. This appeal is from that part of the final decree granting permanent alimony. Appellant contends that the chancellor was witho..
  Cowan v. Cowan  (1941)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jun. 10, 1941 Citations: 147 Fla. 473, 2 So. 2d 869
Appellant filed his bill for divorce alleging habitual intemperance on the part of defendant. Appellee answered with a cross bill denying the allegations as to intemperance and countering with a charge of cruelty on the part of complainant. On final hearing, the chancellor granted complainant a divorce and the cross complainant fifteen dollars per month permanent alimony. This appeal is from that part of the final decree granting permanent alimony. Appellant contends that the chancellor was witho..
  Hemphill v. Hemphill  (1949)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jan. 05, 1949 Citations: 41 So. 2d 766
Dismissed without opinion.
SC13-2169  Mark A. Twilegar v. State of Florida  (2015)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: May 28, 2015
Supreme Court of Florida _ No. SC13-2169 _ MARK A. TWILEGAR, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [May 28, 2015] PER CURIAM. This case is before the Court on appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a judgment of conviction of first-degree murder and a sentence of death under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, ยง 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the following reasons, we affirm. STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS The facts were summarized by this Court in..

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer