welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Tabitha Gail Harnage
Tabitha Gail Harnage
Tabitha Gail Harnage
Visitors: 87
0
Bar #115729(FL)     License for 10 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Tabitha Gail Harnage? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

16-000355  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs NORTHLAKE MOBILE ENTERPRISES, INC. (15-136-D2); MB FOOD AND BEVERAGE, INC. (15-137-D2); CONGRESS VALERO, INC. (15-138-D2); HENA ENTERPRISES, INC. (15-139-D2); HAYMA ENTERPRISES, INC. (15-140-D2); AND BLUE HERON BP, INC. (15-141-D2), ET AL.  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 22, 2016
Whether Respondents violated the provisions of chapter 440, Florida Statutes, by failing to secure the payment of workers' compensation coverage, as alleged in the Stop-Work Orders, and, if so, what penalty is appropriate.Respondents violated the requirement in chapter 440 to secure workers' compensation coverage. Recommend penalty assessments in the total amount of $53,503.44.
16-000361  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs NORTHLAKE MOBILE ENTERPRISES, INC. (15-136-D2); MB FOOD AND BEVERAGE, INC. (15-137-D2); CONGRESS VALERO, INC. (15-138-D2); HENA ENTERPRISES, INC. (15-139-D2); HAYMA ENTERPRISES, INC. (15-140-D2); AND BLUE HERON BP, INC. (15-141-D2), ET AL.  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 22, 2016
Whether Respondents violated the provisions of chapter 440, Florida Statutes, by failing to secure the payment of workers' compensation coverage, as alleged in the Stop-Work Orders, and, if so, what penalty is appropriate.Respondents violated the requirement in chapter 440 to secure workers' compensation coverage. Recommend penalty assessments in the total amount of $53,503.44.
16-000362  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs NORTHLAKE MOBILE ENTERPRISES, INC. (15-136-D2); MB FOOD AND BEVERAGE, INC. (15-137-D2); CONGRESS VALERO, INC. (15-138-D2); HENA ENTERPRISES, INC. (15-139-D2); HAYMA ENTERPRISES, INC. (15-140-D2); AND BLUE HERON BP, INC. (15-141-D2), ET AL.  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 22, 2016
Whether Respondents violated the provisions of chapter 440, Florida Statutes, by failing to secure the payment of workers' compensation coverage, as alleged in the Stop-Work Orders, and, if so, what penalty is appropriate.Respondents violated the requirement in chapter 440 to secure workers' compensation coverage. Recommend penalty assessments in the total amount of $53,503.44.
16-000364  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs NORTHLAKE MOBILE ENTERPRISES, INC. (15-136-D2); MB FOOD AND BEVERAGE, INC. (15-137-D2); CONGRESS VALERO, INC. (15-138-D2); HENA ENTERPRISES, INC. (15-139-D2); HAYMA ENTERPRISES, INC. (15-140-D2); AND BLUE HERON BP, INC. (15-141-D2), ET AL.  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 22, 2016
Whether Respondents violated the provisions of chapter 440, Florida Statutes, by failing to secure the payment of workers' compensation coverage, as alleged in the Stop-Work Orders, and, if so, what penalty is appropriate.Respondents violated the requirement in chapter 440 to secure workers' compensation coverage. Recommend penalty assessments in the total amount of $53,503.44.
16-000365  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs NORTHLAKE MOBILE ENTERPRISES, INC. (15-136-D2); MB FOOD AND BEVERAGE, INC. (15-137-D2); CONGRESS VALERO, INC. (15-138-D2); HENA ENTERPRISES, INC. (15-139-D2); HAYMA ENTERPRISES, INC. (15-140-D2); AND BLUE HERON BP, INC. (15-141-D2), ET AL.  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 22, 2016
Whether Respondents violated the provisions of chapter 440, Florida Statutes, by failing to secure the payment of workers' compensation coverage, as alleged in the Stop-Work Orders, and, if so, what penalty is appropriate.Respondents violated the requirement in chapter 440 to secure workers' compensation coverage. Recommend penalty assessments in the total amount of $53,503.44.
16-000367  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs NORTHLAKE MOBILE ENTERPRISES, INC. (15-136-D2); MB FOOD AND BEVERAGE, INC. (15-137-D2); CONGRESS VALERO, INC. (15-138-D2); HENA ENTERPRISES, INC. (15-139-D2); HAYMA ENTERPRISES, INC. (15-140-D2); AND BLUE HERON BP, INC. (15-141-D2), ET AL.  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 22, 2016
Whether Respondents violated the provisions of chapter 440, Florida Statutes, by failing to secure the payment of workers' compensation coverage, as alleged in the Stop-Work Orders, and, if so, what penalty is appropriate.Respondents violated the requirement in chapter 440 to secure workers' compensation coverage. Recommend penalty assessments in the total amount of $53,503.44.
16-002425  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs MS DOCKSIDE MARINA, LLC  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 02, 2016
The issue in this case is whether MS Dockside Marina, LLC (Respondent), violated the provisions of chapter 440, Florida Statutes,1/ by failing to secure the payment of workers’ compensation, as alleged in the Stop-Work Order and Second Amended Order of Penalty Assessment; and, if so, what is the appropriate penalty.The Longshoremen and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act did not exempt Respondent from the requirements of Florida's Workers' Compensation Law, and the Department proved that the Stop-Work Order and 2d Amended Penalty Assessment should be imposed.
16-002036  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs PRO QUALITY ENTERPRISES, LLC  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 13, 2016
The issue in this case is whether Respondent, Pro Quality Enterprises, LLC (“Pro Quality”), should have a penalty assessed against it by Petitioner, Department of Financial Services, Division of Workers’ Compensation (the “Department”), for failure to have workers’ compensation insurance in place, and, if so, the amount of such penalty or assessment.The Department failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that Respondent was engaged in an activity requiring workers' compensation insurance coverage.
16-001258  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs SDPHOTONICS, LLC  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 03, 2016
The issues in this case are whether SDPhotonics, LLC (Respondent), failed to provide workers' compensation coverage; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.The Department proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent did not have workers' compensation insurance; Respondent owes amended penalty.
16-000762  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs ERIC KACHNYCZ, LLC, D/B/A DONE RIGHT IRRIGATION AND LIGHTING  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 11, 2016
The issue in this case is whether Respondent, Eric Kachnycz, LLC d/b/a Done Right Irrigation and Lighting (“Done Right”), should have a penalty assessed against it by Petitioner, Department of Financial Services, Division of Workers’ Compensation (the “Department”), and, if so, the amount of such penalty or assessment.The Department proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent owes a penalty assessment in the amount of $3,581.84.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer