Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Theodore Erwin Mack
Theodore Erwin Mack
Visitors: 91
0
Bar #200840(FL)     License for 50 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Theodore Erwin Mack? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

97-005355  DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS AND TRAINING COMMISSION vs ANTHONY R. JAMES  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 13, 1997
The issue in the case is whether the Respondent is quilty of the violation alleged in the Administrative Complaint; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Agency proved Respondent misused his position and made technically false statement.
97-005432CON  BEVERLY ENTERPRISES-FLORIDA, INC., D/B/A BEVERLY GULF COAST-FLORIDA, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION; REGENTS PARK, INC.; AND WHITEHALL BOCA, AN ILLINOIS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 20, 1997
Which, if any, of the proposals of the co-batched applicants meet the criteria for the issuance of certificate(s) of need in response to the projected need for 168 additional community nursing home beds in Palm Beach County, for the year 2000 planning horizon.Letter of Intent rule at time of hearing applies; financial unfeasibility disqualifies applicants; costs, location, services and quality of care (superior licenses) determinative of most qualified Certificate of Need.
98-001641BID  ROBERT COOK, SARA COOK, AND ALAN TAYLOR vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (1998)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 09, 1998
Whether the Department of Juvenile Justice's (Respondent) decision to reject all bids is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest or fraudulent and should be rejected.Petitioner failed to prove that agency`s rejection of all bids was illegal, arbitrary, dishonest or fraudulent; agency`s articulated reasons sufficient even though supervisor dishonest in her response.
89-006088  SOUTH COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1989)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 03, 1989
The primary issue is whether the allocation of funds from specific appropriation 895 of the 1989-90 General Appropriations Act made by the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services in District IX was proper. That portion of the General Appropriations Act provided a special price level increase for providers of crisis stabilization services. The secondary issue is whether the Department's distribution in District IX was computed correctly, utilizing the Department's own methodology.How HRS interprets general appropriations act and distributes money to districts for crisis stabilization beds not subject to APA review. No jurisdiction.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer