welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Timothy Joseph Perry
Timothy Joseph Perry
Timothy Joseph Perry
Visitors: 125
0
Bar #496391(FL)     License for 24 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Timothy Joseph Perry? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 16 U.S.C 668, 42 U.S.C 1395w

CFR: 42 CFR 422, 42 CFR 422.350, 42 CFR 422.350, 42 CFR 422.350, 42 CFR 422.352, 42 CFR 422.354

Florida Laws: 120.52, 120.53, 120.536, 120.54, 120.55, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.573, 120.595, 120.60, 120.68, 161.021, 161.041, 161.052, 161.053, 161.101, 161.141, 161.142, 161.161, 163.3161, 20.255, 20.331, 258.36, 26.52, 267.061, 287.001, 287.012, 287.042, 287.057, 35.01, 373.016, 373.069, 373.079, 373.119, 373.406, 373.413, 373.4131, 373.4135, 373.4136, 373.414, 373.416, 373.421, 373.427, 379.2431, 380.06, 403.067, 403.088, 403.161, 403.412, 403.803, 403.813, 409.901, 409.912, 409.91211, 409.962, 409.966, 409.974, 409.981, 456.053, 553.73, 553.79, 561.29, 562.11, 57.105, 57.111, 59.29, 616.07, 641.316, 7.09, 7.50, 704.06, 768.28, 790.221, 872.05, 948.01

Florida Administrative Code: 28-106.111, 28-106.201, 28-106.204, 28-106.217, 28-106.301, 62-110.106, 62-302.300, 62-302.700, 62-330.090, 62-330.201, 62-330.310, 62-330.315, 62-330.340, 62-4.242, 62-40.432, 62-621.300, 62-660.300, 62B-33.005, 62B-36.002, 62B-41.003, 62B-41.005, 62B-41.008

11-005313  AMANDA POPE vs DANIEL AND DONNA GRACE; JOSEPH AND LINDA NOFTELL; PAUL AND DEBRA LINGER; ANN PASTORE; THOMPSON AND DANA FILLMER; JOSEPH AND DOTTIE SCRUGGS; STEPHEN FREY; LINDSEY BRANLITT AND JACQUELINE PORTER, TRUSTEES OF THE LAND TRUST DATED MAY 1, 2005; ET AL.  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 14, 2011
At issue in this proceeding is whether Respondents Daniel and Donna Grace; Joseph and Linda Oftell; Paul and Debra Linger; Ann Pastore; Thompson and Dana Fillmer; Joseph and Dottie Scruggs; Stephen Frey; and Lindsey Bramlitt and Jacqueline Porter, Trustees of the Land Trust dated May 1, 2005 (collectively referenced herein as "Applicants") qualify for an exemption from the requirements of coastal construction control line ("CCCL") permitting pursuant to section 161.053(11)(b), Florida Statutes, for their proposed activities in regard to a dune walkover structure seaward of the CCCL at the end of Milliken Lane in St. Johns County, as provided in the Amended Exemption Determination issued by the Department of Environmental Protection ("Department") on September 8, 2011.Applicants failed to demonstrate entitlement to an exemption for the repair of a dune walkover pursuant to section 161.053(11)(b), Florida Statutes.
11-006248  ANASTASIA, INC. vs DANIEL A. MOWREY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 09, 2011
At issue in this proceeding is whether Respondents Daniel and Donna Grace; Joseph and Linda Oftell; Paul and Debra Linger; Ann Pastore; Thompson and Dana Fillmer; Joseph and Dottie Scruggs; Stephen Frey; and Lindsey Bramlitt and Jacqueline Porter, Trustees of the Land Trust dated May 1, 2005 (collectively referenced herein as "Applicants") qualify for an exemption from the requirements of coastal construction control line ("CCCL") permitting pursuant to section 161.053(11)(b), Florida Statutes, for their proposed activities in regard to a dune walkover structure seaward of the CCCL at the end of Milliken Lane in St. Johns County, as provided in the Amended Exemption Determination issued by the Department of Environmental Protection ("Department") on September 8, 2011.Applicants failed to demonstrate entitlement to an exemption for the repair of a dune walkover pursuant to section 161.053(11)(b), Florida Statutes.
07-005216  JAMES HASSELBACK vs DANIEL G. AND DORIS WENTZ AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 10, 2011
The issues are whether the Department of Environmental Protection's (Department's) proposed agency action to issue a coastal construction control line (CCCL) permit to Respondents, Daniel G. and Doris L. Wentz (Wentzes or applicants), affects the substantial interests of Petitioner, James Hasselback, and if so, whether he timely filed his request for a hearing.Petitioner received constructive notice of agency action through his attorney and another property owner and did not timely file his petition. The Petition is dismissed, with prejudice.
20-002123F  CITY OF DESTIN vs THOMAS WILSON, DAVID H. SHERRY, REBECCA R. SHERRY, AND JOHN S. DONOVAN  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 06, 2020
The issue to be determined is whether Destin is entitled to attorney’s fees pursuant to section 120.569(2)(e), from Respondents related to litigation between the parties in DOAH Case No. 19-3356.Petitioner failed to establish that Respondent filed any pleading, motion, or other paper in Case No. 19-3356 for an improper purpose. Thus, the motion for fees under section 120.595(2)(e) is denied.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer