Leon FL Lawyers | William David Watkins -- eLawyers

86-004228 MEASE HEALTH CARE vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1986)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Feb. 20, 1987

Petitioner's letter of intent to apply for Certificate Of Need was timely received by HRS and should be considered. Preponderance of evidence showed letter was received.

86-001475 MERCY HOSPITAL vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1986)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Feb. 04, 1987

Petitioner, Mercy Hospital, Inc., contests the decision of the Respondent, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, to deny its application for a certificate of need to convert 29 medical/surgical beds to 29 long-term substance abuse beds at its existing acute care hospital in Miami, Dade County, Florida.Applicant's failure to demonstrate meaningful average length of stay rendered bed need calculation unreliable

86-001471 FRANK P. FILIBERTO vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1986)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Oct. 23, 1986

Certificate Of Need application deemed complete. Statute did not require applicant to submit evidence of lending institution's interest in proposed project.

84-001976 WUESTHOFF HEALTH SERVICES, INC. vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1984)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Oct. 08, 1986

At de novo Certificate Of Need hearing figures used in calculating need are most recent figures for period in question. Rule on need can't be modified at hearing--no need shown.

86-002000 UNITED HEALTH, INC. vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1986)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Sep. 17, 1986

When agency attempts to deny right to due process hearing based on non- timely filing, it has burden.Receipt in agency mailroom is receipt by agency

85-000045 VENICE HOSPITAL, INC. vs. MANASOTA AND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1985)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 26, 1986

Petitioner did not prove it would really operate as osteopathic hospital in terms of Doctors' Osteopathic staff and Doctors' Osteopathic control of management can consider utilization at all osteopathic hospitals in determining need.

83-002244 FAMILY CENTER OSTEOPATHIC HOSPITAL, INC. vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1983)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 07, 1986

Certificate Of Need denied for failing to show ability to provide quality care, adequate manpower and funding, and adverse impact on area competitors.

84-002635CON GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL, INC. vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1984)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 25, 1985

Whether petitioner, Good Samaritan Hospital, Inc., is entitled to have its certificate of need (CON) application reviewed in the June 15, 1984 batching cycle.Relief denied. Grace period was not activated. Competitor filed letter of intent before deadline. Grace period only activated when no competitors file.

83-003577CON SOUTH SARASOTA COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1983)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Feb. 15, 1985

The ultimate issue is whether the application of Venice Hospital for a CON should be approved. The factual issue is whether Venice Hospital meets the criteria set forth in the statute and rules.Grant the Certificate of Need (CON) to the hospital on the condition that it meet all the requirements for certification of its lab.

William David Watkins