An Employer's Liability for Employee's Acts

Employers can be held responsible for the conduct of their employees even if the employer had no intention to cause harm and played no direct role in the harm experienced. This is because of two basic concepts relating to employer liability. First, employers direct the behavior of their employees and receive the benefit of their efforts when things work out. This notion suggests that negative consequences also "belong" to the employer. Second, employers are most likely able to compensate someone who is injured or harmed. Regardless of the fairness, the legal system wants to identify an arguably responsible party that can make the victim whole and the employer presents the best opportunity to achieve this goal.

Job-related accidents result in liability for employers under the doctrine of "respondeat superior" for the negligence of their workers in the course of their employment. If the employee causes an accident unrelated to the work this does not generally result in liability for the employer, however. If one worker injures another they are compensated under the worker's compensation rather than a liability lawsuit.

Negligent hiring or retention, unlike job related misconduct, arises from acts performed by an employee outside of their employment. The most common example of this is when an employer hires someone with a criminal record such that their customers are placed at risk. Conducting a background check on employees, especially those in contact with the public, provides some insulation from liability.

Harassment among employees is a growing source of liability for employers. An employer may be held liable for harassment unless they can prove that they exercised reasonable care to prevent and promptly correct any harassment and the employee suffering the harassment unreasonably failed to complain to management or otherwise avoid harm.

The Small Business Owner and Slip-and-Fall Accidents

When someone slips, trips, and falls on someone else's property and is injured the property owner is often liable on account of "premises liability." This is particularly so when there is a dangerous condition such as torn carpeting, changes in flooring, poor lighting, a narrow stairwell, or a wet floor. Rain, ice, snow, potholes, and other obstacles may also create a hazard.

There is no precise method for connecting a property-owner with the responsibility for a slip and fall accident, but situations where the owner/possessor created the condition, knew of the condition and negligently failed to correct it, or the condition existed for such a length of time that the owner/possessor should have known of and corrected the condition prior to the accident would result in liability.