Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

David C. White v. W.T. Shearer, 95-1301 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 95-1301 Visitors: 129
Filed: Dec. 06, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 72 F.3d 139 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. David C. WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W.T. SHEARER, et al., Defendants-Appellees
More

72 F.3d 139

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

David C. WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
W.T. SHEARER, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-1301.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Dec. 6, 1995.

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.

1

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

2

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

3

Appellant David C. White appeals the district court's dismissal of his civil rights complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C.1915(d). We find no error in the district court's rulings. All requested relief is denied.

4

Appellant's motion to proceed informa pauperis is granted. AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer