Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Herbert L. Miller v. The Secretary of the United States Department of Treasury, 95-5163 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 95-5163 Visitors: 25
Filed: Feb. 12, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 76 F.3d 393 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Herbert L. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The SECRETARY of the United States Depa
More

76 F.3d 393

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Herbert L. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The SECRETARY of the United States Department of Treasury,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-5163.
(D.C.No. 88-C-504-E)

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Feb. 12, 1996.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT1

Before PORFILIO, McKAY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

1

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

2

We have examined the briefs and record in this case and have concluded the trial court committed no reversible error. We therefore AFFIRM its judgment for the reasons stated in the District Court Order of June 5, 1995. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

1

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer