Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Barron v. State, SC06-755 (2008)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number: SC06-755 Visitors: 32
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Feb. 21, 2008
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 976 So. 2d 577 (2008) Terry BARRON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. No. SC06-755. Supreme Court of Florida. February 21, 2008. Terry Barron, Pro se, Crestview, FL, for Petitioner. *578 Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent. PER CURIAM. We have for review Barron v. State, 931 So. 2d 929 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006), in which the Second District Court of Appeal certified conflict with Isaac v. State, 911 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), notice to invoke discretionary j
More
976 So. 2d 577 (2008)

Terry BARRON, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. SC06-755.

Supreme Court of Florida.

February 21, 2008.

Terry Barron, Pro se, Crestview, FL, for Petitioner.

*578 Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Barron v. State, 931 So. 2d 929 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006), in which the Second District Court of Appeal certified conflict with Isaac v. State, 911 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction filed, No. SC05-2047 (Fla. Oct.31, 2005). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, ยง 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We stayed proceedings in this case pending disposition of Galindez v. State, 955 So. 2d 517 (Fla.2007), which we ultimately decided on harmless error grounds based on a thorough review of the record. We thereafter issued an order directing petitioner to show cause why our Galindez decision should not control the outcome of the present case. However, petitioner's response does not contain enough information or record attachments for us to perform a Galindez harmless error analysis. Moreover, we cannot unilaterally perform such an analysis, as the record is not before this Court.

We accordingly grant the petition for review in the present case. The decision under review is quashed and this matter is remanded to the Second District Court for application of a harmless error analysis based on our decision in Galindez and a thorough review of the record.

It is so ordered.

LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer