Filed: May 05, 1998
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 158 F.3d 1060 8 A.D. Cases 1093 Robert W. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MIDLAND BRAKE, INC., a division of Echlin, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. Equal Employment Advisory Council; Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; City and County of Denver, Amici Curiae. No. 96-3018. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. May 5, 1998. Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, PORFILIO, ANDERSON, TACHA, BALDOCK, BRORBY, EBEL, KELLY, HENRY, BRISCOE, LUCERO, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The court grants rehea
Summary: 158 F.3d 1060 8 A.D. Cases 1093 Robert W. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MIDLAND BRAKE, INC., a division of Echlin, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. Equal Employment Advisory Council; Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; City and County of Denver, Amici Curiae. No. 96-3018. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. May 5, 1998. Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, PORFILIO, ANDERSON, TACHA, BALDOCK, BRORBY, EBEL, KELLY, HENRY, BRISCOE, LUCERO, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The court grants rehear..
More
158 F.3d 1060
8 A.D. Cases 1093
Robert W. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MIDLAND BRAKE, INC., a division of Echlin, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
Equal Employment Advisory Council; Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission; City and County of
Denver, Amici Curiae.
No. 96-3018.
United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.
May 5, 1998.
Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, PORFILIO, ANDERSON, TACHA, BALDOCK, BRORBY, EBEL, KELLY, HENRY, BRISCOE, LUCERO, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
1
The court grants rehearing en banc in this case on the issue of interpretation of the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., specifically 42 U.S .C. § 12111(9)(B).
2
Appellant shall file a supplemental brief on or before June 4, 1998. Appellee shall file a response brief within 25 days of service of appellant's brief.
