Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Garrett Delmar Jones, Jr., 12-16209 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 12-16209 Visitors: 80
Filed: Jul. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-16209 Date Filed: 07/09/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-16209 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00084-DHB-WLB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GARRETT DELMAR JONES, JR., a.k.a. Straw, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (July 9, 2013) Before HULL, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-1620
More
           Case: 12-16209   Date Filed: 07/09/2013   Page: 1 of 2


                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 12-16209
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00084-DHB-WLB-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

GARRETT DELMAR JONES, JR.,
a.k.a. Straw,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Southern District of Georgia
                      ________________________

                               (July 9, 2013)

Before HULL, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 12-16209     Date Filed: 07/09/2013   Page: 2 of 2


      Andrew Magruder, appointed counsel for Garrett Jones, in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jones’s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer