Filed: Jul. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-15875 Date Filed: 07/11/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15875 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00034-SPM-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PHILLIP WILLIAM WINTERS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (July 11, 2013) Before HULL, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-15875 Date Filed
Summary: Case: 12-15875 Date Filed: 07/11/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15875 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00034-SPM-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PHILLIP WILLIAM WINTERS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (July 11, 2013) Before HULL, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-15875 Date Filed:..
More
Case: 12-15875 Date Filed: 07/11/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-15875
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00034-SPM-GRJ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PHILLIP WILLIAM WINTERS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(July 11, 2013)
Before HULL, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 12-15875 Date Filed: 07/11/2013 Page: 2 of 2
Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Phillip William Winters, in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Winters=s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2