Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Phillip William Winters, 12-15875 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 12-15875 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-15875 Date Filed: 07/11/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15875 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00034-SPM-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PHILLIP WILLIAM WINTERS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (July 11, 2013) Before HULL, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-15875 Date Filed
More
           Case: 12-15875   Date Filed: 07/11/2013   Page: 1 of 2




                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 12-15875
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00034-SPM-GRJ-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                 versus

PHILLIP WILLIAM WINTERS,

                                                        Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                             (July 11, 2013)

Before HULL, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 12-15875     Date Filed: 07/11/2013   Page: 2 of 2


      Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Phillip William Winters, in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Winters=s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer