Filed: Jul. 16, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-15555 Date Filed: 07/16/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15555 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:12-cr-00185-AKK-RRA-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO HERNANDEZ-HINOJOSA, a.k.a. Tony X, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (July 16, 2013) Case: 12-15555 Date Filed: 07/16/2013 Page: 2 of 2 Before HULL, JORDA
Summary: Case: 12-15555 Date Filed: 07/16/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15555 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:12-cr-00185-AKK-RRA-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO HERNANDEZ-HINOJOSA, a.k.a. Tony X, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (July 16, 2013) Case: 12-15555 Date Filed: 07/16/2013 Page: 2 of 2 Before HULL, JORDAN..
More
Case: 12-15555 Date Filed: 07/16/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-15555
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:12-cr-00185-AKK-RRA-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANTONIO HERNANDEZ-HINOJOSA,
a.k.a. Tony X,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
________________________
(July 16, 2013)
Case: 12-15555 Date Filed: 07/16/2013 Page: 2 of 2
Before HULL, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Donald L. Colee, Jr., appointed counsel for Antonio Hernandez-Hinojosa in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87
S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hernandez-Hinojosa’s
conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2