Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Antonio Hernandez-Hinojosa, 12-15555 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 12-15555 Visitors: 64
Filed: Jul. 16, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-15555 Date Filed: 07/16/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15555 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:12-cr-00185-AKK-RRA-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO HERNANDEZ-HINOJOSA, a.k.a. Tony X, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (July 16, 2013) Case: 12-15555 Date Filed: 07/16/2013 Page: 2 of 2 Before HULL, JORDA
More
          Case: 12-15555   Date Filed: 07/16/2013   Page: 1 of 2


                                                       [DO NOT PUBLISH]




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                   FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                     ________________________

                           No. 12-15555
                       Non-Argument Calendar
                     ________________________

              D.C. Docket No. 4:12-cr-00185-AKK-RRA-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                             Plaintiff-Appellee,


                                 versus


ANTONIO HERNANDEZ-HINOJOSA,
a.k.a. Tony X,

                                                        Defendant-Appellant.

                     ________________________

              Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Northern District of Alabama
                     ________________________

                            (July 16, 2013)
              Case: 12-15555     Date Filed: 07/16/2013    Page: 2 of 2


Before HULL, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Donald L. Colee, Jr., appointed counsel for Antonio Hernandez-Hinojosa in

this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of

the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record

reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of

merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hernandez-Hinojosa’s

conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                           2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer