Filed: Jul. 17, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-15242 Date Filed: 07/17/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15242 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:00-cr-00384-JSM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN CARLOS MUNOZ DOMINGUEZ, a.k.a. Juan Munoz, a.k.a. Carlos Rodriguez, a.k.a. Juan Carlos Munoz, a.k.a. Mario Moreno, a.k.a. Juan C. Munoz, Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Fl
Summary: Case: 12-15242 Date Filed: 07/17/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15242 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:00-cr-00384-JSM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN CARLOS MUNOZ DOMINGUEZ, a.k.a. Juan Munoz, a.k.a. Carlos Rodriguez, a.k.a. Juan Carlos Munoz, a.k.a. Mario Moreno, a.k.a. Juan C. Munoz, Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Flo..
More
Case: 12-15242 Date Filed: 07/17/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-15242
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:00-cr-00384-JSM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUAN CARLOS MUNOZ DOMINGUEZ,
a.k.a. Juan Munoz,
a.k.a. Carlos Rodriguez,
a.k.a. Juan Carlos Munoz,
a.k.a. Mario Moreno,
a.k.a. Juan C. Munoz,
Defendant - Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(July 17, 2013)
Before CARNES, HULL and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 12-15242 Date Filed: 07/17/2013 Page: 2 of 2
Jenny L. Devine, appointed counsel for Juan Dominguez in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dominguez=s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2