Filed: Jul. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-14269 Date Filed: 07/18/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-14269 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00097-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT MOECKEL, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (July 18, 2013) Before HULL, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Clinton A. Couch, appointed counsel for Rob
Summary: Case: 12-14269 Date Filed: 07/18/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-14269 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00097-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT MOECKEL, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (July 18, 2013) Before HULL, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Clinton A. Couch, appointed counsel for Robe..
More
Case: 12-14269 Date Filed: 07/18/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-14269
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00097-MCR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERT MOECKEL,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(July 18, 2013)
Before HULL, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Clinton A. Couch, appointed counsel for Robert Moeckel in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
Case: 12-14269 Date Filed: 07/18/2013 Page: 2 of 2
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Moeckel’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2