Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Corry Averett, 12-12544 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 12-12544 Visitors: 49
Filed: Jul. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-12544 Date Filed: 07/25/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-12544 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00445-AKK-RRA-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee versus CORRY AVERETT, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (July 25, 2013) Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. Case: 12-12544 Date Filed: 07/25/
More
            Case: 12-12544   Date Filed: 07/25/2013   Page: 1 of 2


                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]

             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 12-12544
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00445-AKK-RRA-1


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee


                                   versus



CORRY AVERETT,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Alabama
                       ________________________

                             (July 25, 2013)

Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
              Case: 12-12544     Date Filed: 07/25/2013   Page: 2 of 2




PER CURIAM:

      Charles Scott Linton, appointed counsel for Corry Averett, has moved to

withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to

Anders v. State of California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED,

and Averett’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer