Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Rodney Malcolm Lariscy, 12-14561 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 12-14561 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-14561 Date Filed: 07/25/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-14561 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00463-EAK-TGW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RODNEY MALCOLM LARISCY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 25, 2013) Before HULL, PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Craig L. Crawford, appointed coun
More
              Case: 12-14561    Date Filed: 07/25/2013   Page: 1 of 2


                                                             [DO NOT PUBLISH]


               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                No. 12-14561
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00463-EAK-TGW-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                      versus

RODNEY MALCOLM LARISCY,

                                                             Defendant-Appellant.

                          ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                         ________________________

                                 (July 25, 2013)

Before HULL, PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Craig L. Crawford, appointed counsel for Rodney Malcolm Lariscy in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
              Case: 12-14561     Date Filed: 07/25/2013   Page: 2 of 2


appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lariscy’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer