Filed: Aug. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 13-10367 Date Filed: 08/09/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10367 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00023-SPM-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JONATHAN MATTHEW WOOD, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (August 9, 2013) Before WILSON, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-10367 Date Filed: 0
Summary: Case: 13-10367 Date Filed: 08/09/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10367 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00023-SPM-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JONATHAN MATTHEW WOOD, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (August 9, 2013) Before WILSON, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-10367 Date Filed: 08..
More
Case: 13-10367 Date Filed: 08/09/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-10367
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00023-SPM-GRJ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JONATHAN MATTHEW WOOD,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(August 9, 2013)
Before WILSON, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-10367 Date Filed: 08/09/2013 Page: 2 of 2
Chet Kaufman, counsel for Jonathan Matthew Wood in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Wood’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2