Filed: Aug. 14, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-15384 Date Filed: 08/14/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15384 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:12-cr-00010-JES-DNF-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERWIN PEREZ-GARCIA, a.k.a. Victor Hugogomezcal, a.k.a. Ovilmer Perez-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 14, 2013) Before CARNES, Chief Judge, BARKETT an
Summary: Case: 12-15384 Date Filed: 08/14/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15384 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:12-cr-00010-JES-DNF-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERWIN PEREZ-GARCIA, a.k.a. Victor Hugogomezcal, a.k.a. Ovilmer Perez-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 14, 2013) Before CARNES, Chief Judge, BARKETT and..
More
Case: 12-15384 Date Filed: 08/14/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-15384
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:12-cr-00010-JES-DNF-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ERWIN PEREZ-GARCIA,
a.k.a. Victor Hugogomezcal,
a.k.a. Ovilmer Perez-Lopez,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(August 14, 2013)
Before CARNES, Chief Judge, BARKETT and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 12-15384 Date Filed: 08/14/2013 Page: 2 of 2
Rosemary Cakmis, counsel for Erwin Perez-Garcia in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Perez-Garcia’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2