Filed: Sep. 05, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-14308 Date Filed: 09/05/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-14308 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00326-TWT-JFK-5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PETER RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (September 5, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Leonard Franco, appointe
Summary: Case: 12-14308 Date Filed: 09/05/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-14308 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00326-TWT-JFK-5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PETER RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (September 5, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Leonard Franco, appointed..
More
Case: 12-14308 Date Filed: 09/05/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-14308
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00326-TWT-JFK-5
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PETER RAYMOND WILLIAMS,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
_________________________
(September 5, 2013)
Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Leonard Franco, appointed counsel for Peter Raymond Williams in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396, 18
Case: 12-14308 Date Filed: 09/05/2013 Page: 2 of
2
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Williams=s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2