Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Peter Raymond Williams, 12-14308 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 12-14308 Visitors: 82
Filed: Sep. 05, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-14308 Date Filed: 09/05/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-14308 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00326-TWT-JFK-5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PETER RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (September 5, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Leonard Franco, appointe
More
              Case: 12-14308    Date Filed: 09/05/2013   Page: 1 of 2


                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                 No. 12-14308
                             Non-Argument Calendar
                           ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00326-TWT-JFK-5


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                          versus

PETER RAYMOND WILLIAMS,
                                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Georgia
                        _________________________

                               (September 5, 2013)

Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Leonard Franco, appointed counsel for Peter Raymond Williams in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant

and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 18
              Case: 12-14308    Date Filed: 09/05/2013   Page: 2 of 
2 L. Ed. 2d 493
 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Williams=s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer