Filed: Sep. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 13-10494 Date Filed: 09/09/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10494 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:08-cr-20439-CMA-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ENRIQUE GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (September 9, 2013) Before DUBINA, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-10494 Date Filed: 09/09/20
Summary: Case: 13-10494 Date Filed: 09/09/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10494 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:08-cr-20439-CMA-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ENRIQUE GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (September 9, 2013) Before DUBINA, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-10494 Date Filed: 09/09/201..
More
Case: 13-10494 Date Filed: 09/09/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-10494
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:08-cr-20439-CMA-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ENRIQUE GONZALEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(September 9, 2013)
Before DUBINA, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-10494 Date Filed: 09/09/2013 Page: 2 of 2
Mauricio L. Aldazabal, appointed counsel for Enrique Gonzalez in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gonzalez’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2