Filed: Oct. 16, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-13619 Date Filed: 10/16/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-13619 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:10-cr-00054-RH-CAS-14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SANCHEZ LEE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (October 16, 2013) Before MARCUS, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Michael Ufferman, appointed counsel f
Summary: Case: 12-13619 Date Filed: 10/16/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-13619 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:10-cr-00054-RH-CAS-14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SANCHEZ LEE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (October 16, 2013) Before MARCUS, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Michael Ufferman, appointed counsel fo..
More
Case: 12-13619 Date Filed: 10/16/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-13619
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:10-cr-00054-RH-CAS-14
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SANCHEZ LEE,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(October 16, 2013)
Before MARCUS, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Ufferman, appointed counsel for Sanchez Lee in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
Case: 12-13619 Date Filed: 10/16/2013 Page: 2 of 2
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lee’s convictions and sentences
are AFFIRMED.
2