Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Freddie Loy Walker, Jr., 16-16760 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 16-16760 Visitors: 107
Filed: Oct. 23, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-14075 Date Filed: 10/23/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-14075 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00009-RH-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FREDDIE LOY WALKER, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (October 23, 2013) Before MARTIN, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Michael Ufferman, appointe
More
              Case: 12-14075     Date Filed: 10/23/2013   Page: 1 of 2


                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                 No. 12-14075
                             Non-Argument Calendar
                           ________________________

                    D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00009-RH-GRJ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                       versus

FREDDIE LOY WALKER, JR.,

                                                              Defendant-Appellant.
                           ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Florida
                         ________________________

                                (October 23, 2013)

Before MARTIN, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Michael Ufferman, appointed counsel for Freddie Loy Walker Jr., in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 87 S.Ct.
              Case: 12-14075     Date Filed: 10/23/2013   Page: 2 of 2


1396, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Walker’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer