Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Residences at Ocean Grande, Inc. v. Allianz Global, 09-15145 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 09-15145 Visitors: 54
Filed: May 18, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 09-15145 MAY 18, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D. C. Docket No. 07-22656-CV-JAL RESIDENCES AT OCEAN GRANDE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ALLIANZ GLOBAL RISKS US INSURANCE COMPANY, f.k.a. Allianz Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (May 18, 2010) Before BIRCH and MARCUS, Circuit Judg
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 09-15145 MAY 18, 2010 ________________________ JOHN LEY CLERK D. C. Docket No. 07-22656-CV-JAL RESIDENCES AT OCEAN GRANDE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ALLIANZ GLOBAL RISKS US INSURANCE COMPANY, f.k.a. Allianz Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _________________________ (May 18, 2010) Before BIRCH and MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and HODGES,* District Judge. PER CURIAM: In this insurance dispute, plaintiff the Residences at Ocean Grande, Inc. * Honorable Wm. Terrell Hodges, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation. (ROG), appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Co. (Allianz). The district court had granted final summary judgment in favor of Allianz because ROG’s claim for reimbursement was foreclosed both by the insurance contract’s fungi exclusion endorsement and by its defective materials exclusion. We affirm the entry of final judgment in favor of Allianz. We do so based on the well-reasoned and thorough order of the district court, dated September 9, 2009, and the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge, dated June 3, 2008, and adopted by the district court on July 3, 2008. AFFIRMED. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer