Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Eneyda Romero Molina, 09-14827 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 09-14827 Visitors: 30
Filed: May 20, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAY 20, 2010 No. 09-14827 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-00457-CR-1-CAP UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ENEYDA ROMERO MOLINA, a.k.a. Martha Salgado-Vega, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (May 20, 1020) Before MARCUS, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judg
More
                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]


              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                   FILED
                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT   U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                        ________________________   ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                                MAY 20, 2010
                              No. 09-14827                       JOHN LEY
                          Non-Argument Calendar                    CLERK
                        ________________________

                    D. C. Docket No. 08-00457-CR-1-CAP

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

ENEYDA ROMERO MOLINA,
a.k.a. Martha Salgado-Vega,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.


                        ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Northern District of Georgia
                      _________________________

                               (May 20, 1020)

Before MARCUS, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     David Marshall, appointed counsel for Eneyda Romero Molina in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Molina’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer