Filed: Jun. 02, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-15854 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 2, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 05-00024-CR-1-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MIKE ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (June 2, 2010) Before BARKETT, HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: O. Hale Almand, Jr., appo
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-15854 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 2, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 05-00024-CR-1-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MIKE ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (June 2, 2010) Before BARKETT, HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: O. Hale Almand, Jr., appoi..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 09-15854 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JUNE 2, 2010
Non-Argument Calendar
JOHN LEY
________________________
CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 05-00024-CR-1-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MIKE ADAMS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
_________________________
(June 2, 2010)
Before BARKETT, HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
O. Hale Almand, Jr., appointed counsel for Michael Tyrone Adams, has
moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because, in his
opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders
v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Adams’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.
2