Filed: Jul. 13, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-16446 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 13, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 08-00325-CR-J-34HTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CORNELIUS MURPHY, a.k.a. Kemo, a.k.a. Ookie, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 13, 2010) Before BARKETT, HULL and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-16446 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 13, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 08-00325-CR-J-34HTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CORNELIUS MURPHY, a.k.a. Kemo, a.k.a. Ookie, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 13, 2010) Before BARKETT, HULL and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER C..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 09-16446 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JULY 13, 2010
Non-Argument Calendar
JOHN LEY
________________________
CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 08-00325-CR-J-34HTS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CORNELIUS MURPHY,
a.k.a. Kemo,
a.k.a. Ookie,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(July 13, 2010)
Before BARKETT, HULL and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A. Russell Smith, appointed counsel for Cornelius Murphy in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Murphy’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2