Filed: Jul. 13, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-14673 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 13, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 08-00326-CR-J-20-TEM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES ROBERT COTTER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 13, 2010) Before CARNES, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: James H. Burk
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-14673 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 13, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 08-00326-CR-J-20-TEM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES ROBERT COTTER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 13, 2010) Before CARNES, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: James H. Burke..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 09-14673 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JULY 13, 2010
Non-Argument Calendar
JOHN LEY
________________________
CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 08-00326-CR-J-20-TEM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAMES ROBERT COTTER,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(July 13, 2010)
Before CARNES, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
James H. Burke, Jr., appointed counsel for James Robert Cotter in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cotter’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2